DEEP vs. TSCV

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

DEEP (Roundhill Acquirers Deep Value ETF) and TSCV (Thrivent Small Cap Value ETF) are both Small Cap Value Equities funds. DEEP is passively managed, while TSCV is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DEEP charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for TSCV.

Performance

DEEP vs. TSCV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Acquirers Deep Value ETF (DEEP) and Thrivent Small Cap Value ETF (TSCV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DEEP achieves a 12.39% return, which is significantly lower than TSCV's 15.89% return.

DEEP

• 1D: -2.02%
• 1M: 0.72%
• YTD: 12.39%
• 6M: 11.91%
• 1Y: 27.76%
• 3Y*: 9.78%
• 5Y*: 3.74%
• 10Y*: 8.15%

TSCV

• 1D: -0.29%
• 1M: 1.16%
• YTD: 15.89%
• 6M: 14.99%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DEEP vs. TSCV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
DEEP Roundhill Acquirers Deep Value ETF	12.39%	7.36%
TSCV Thrivent Small Cap Value ETF	15.89%	6.24%

Correlation

The correlation between DEEP and TSCV is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025	0.81

Return for Risk

DEEP vs. TSCV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DEEP

DEEP Risk / Return Rank: 42
DEEP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
DEEP Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
DEEP Omega Ratio Rank: 38
DEEP Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
DEEP Martin Ratio Rank: 42

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DEEP vs. TSCV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Acquirers Deep Value ETF (DEEP) and Thrivent Small Cap Value ETF (TSCV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DEEP	TSCV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.46	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.16	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.35	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.76	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DEEP	TSCV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.46	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.17	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.34	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.29	2.84	-2.54

Drawdowns

DEEP vs. TSCV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DEEP drawdown since its inception was -52.52%, which is greater than TSCV's maximum drawdown of -10.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DEEP and TSCV.

Drawdown Indicators

	DEEP	TSCV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-52.52%	-10.17%	-42.35%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.87%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.40%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.40%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-52.52%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.02%	-0.70%	-1.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.40%	-2.11%	-8.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.12%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	DEEP	TSCV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.67%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.29%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.18%	16.80%	+2.38%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.65%	16.80%	+4.85%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.27%	16.80%	+7.47%

DEEP vs. TSCV - Expense Ratio Comparison

DEEP has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than TSCV's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

DEEP vs. TSCV - Dividend Comparison

DEEP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.52%, more than TSCV's 0.24% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DEEP Roundhill Acquirers Deep Value ETF	1.52%	1.78%	1.96%	1.67%	1.28%	1.43%	4.03%	3.49%	1.51%	2.01%	3.14%	3.98%
TSCV Thrivent Small Cap Value ETF	0.24%	0.28%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DEEP and TSCV in my portfolio?

DEEP and TSCV have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, DEEP or TSCV?

On fees, TSCV is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, DEEP or TSCV?

TSCV is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for DEEP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DEEP or TSCV?

DEEP has the higher dividend yield at 1.52%, compared with 0.24% for TSCV.

What is the main difference between DEEP and TSCV?

They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and Thrivent. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for DEEP and 0.60% for TSCV.