DEEP vs. BSMC

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

DEEP (Roundhill Acquirers Deep Value ETF) and BSMC (Brandes U.S. Small-Mid Cap Value ETF) are both Small Cap Value Equities funds. DEEP is passively managed, while BSMC is actively managed. Over the past year, DEEP returned 27.76% vs 24.26% for BSMC. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DEEP charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for BSMC.

Performance

DEEP vs. BSMC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Acquirers Deep Value ETF (DEEP) and Brandes U.S. Small-Mid Cap Value ETF (BSMC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DEEP achieves a 12.39% return, which is significantly higher than BSMC's 9.25% return.

DEEP

• 1D: -2.02%
• 1M: 0.72%
• YTD: 12.39%
• 6M: 11.91%
• 1Y: 27.76%
• 3Y*: 9.78%
• 5Y*: 3.74%
• 10Y*: 8.15%

BSMC

• 1D: -0.46%
• 1M: 0.43%
• YTD: 9.25%
• 6M: 9.99%
• 1Y: 24.26%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DEEP vs. BSMC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
DEEP Roundhill Acquirers Deep Value ETF	12.39%	5.69%	-2.97%	14.24%
BSMC Brandes U.S. Small-Mid Cap Value ETF	9.25%	15.52%	10.21%	11.69%

Correlation

The correlation between DEEP and BSMC is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.81
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2023	0.86

The correlation between DEEP and BSMC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

DEEP vs. BSMC - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DEEP	BSMC
Industrials	25.8%	19.1%
Consumer Cyclical	25.5%	6.6%
Consumer Defensive	10.5%	13.0%
Financial Services	8.6%	10.4%
Technology	8.5%	14.7%
Healthcare	6.6%	21.3%
Energy	5.7%	7.5%
Basic Materials	4.8%	3.4%
Communication Services	4.1%	3.9%
Real Estate	3.1%	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

DEEP vs. BSMC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DEEP

DEEP Risk / Return Rank: 42
DEEP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
DEEP Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
DEEP Omega Ratio Rank: 38
DEEP Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
DEEP Martin Ratio Rank: 42

BSMC

BSMC Risk / Return Rank: 52
BSMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
BSMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
BSMC Omega Ratio Rank: 47
BSMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
BSMC Martin Ratio Rank: 56

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DEEP vs. BSMC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Acquirers Deep Value ETF (DEEP) and Brandes U.S. Small-Mid Cap Value ETF (BSMC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DEEP	BSMC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.46	1.68	-0.22
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.16	2.50	-0.34
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.29	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.35	2.70	-0.35
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.76	9.57	-2.81
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DEEP vs. BSMC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DEEP Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is comparable to the BSMC Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DEEP and BSMC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DEEP	BSMC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.46	1.68	-0.22
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.17	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.34	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.29	1.13	-0.83

Drawdowns

DEEP vs. BSMC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DEEP drawdown since its inception was -52.52%, which is greater than BSMC's maximum drawdown of -19.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DEEP and BSMC.

Drawdown Indicators

	DEEP	BSMC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-52.52%	-19.15%	-33.37%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.87%	-9.02%	-2.85%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.40%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.40%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-52.52%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.02%	-1.95%	-0.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.40%	-2.68%	-7.72%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.12%	2.54%	+1.58%

Volatility

DEEP vs. BSMC - Volatility Comparison

Roundhill Acquirers Deep Value ETF (DEEP) has a higher volatility of 5.67% compared to Brandes U.S. Small-Mid Cap Value ETF (BSMC) at 3.97%. This indicates that DEEP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BSMC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DEEP	BSMC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.67%	3.97%	+1.70%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.29%	10.06%	+2.23%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.18%	14.52%	+4.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.65%	16.09%	+5.56%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.27%	16.09%	+8.18%

DEEP vs. BSMC - Expense Ratio Comparison

DEEP has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than BSMC's 0.70% expense ratio.

Dividends

DEEP vs. BSMC - Dividend Comparison

DEEP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.52%, more than BSMC's 0.95% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BSMC Brandes U.S. Small-Mid Cap Value ETF	0.95%	1.17%	1.02%	0.15%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
DEEP Roundhill Acquirers Deep Value ETF	1.52%	1.78%	1.96%	1.67%	1.28%	1.43%	4.03%	3.49%	1.51%	2.01%	3.14%	3.98%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DEEP and BSMC in my portfolio?

DEEP and BSMC have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DEEP or BSMC?

DEEP has higher volatility (5.67%) compared to BSMC (3.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DEEP dropped -52.52% vs BSMC's -19.15%.

Which ETF is better, DEEP or BSMC?

On 1-year performance, DEEP leads with 27.76% vs 24.26% for BSMC. On fees, BSMC is cheaper at 0.70% per year. On volatility, BSMC has been the lower-risk option at 3.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DEEP or BSMC?

Over the 1-year period, DEEP has performed better with a 27.76% return vs 24.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DEEP or BSMC?

BSMC is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for DEEP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DEEP or BSMC?

DEEP has the higher dividend yield at 1.52%, compared with 0.95% for BSMC.

What is the main difference between DEEP and BSMC?

They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and Brandes. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for DEEP and 0.70% for BSMC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BSMC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.