DEEP vs. BSMC
Compare and contrast key facts about Roundhill Acquirers Deep Value ETF (DEEP) and Brandes U.S. Small-Mid Cap Value ETF (BSMC).
DEEP and BSMC are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. DEEP is a passively managed fund by Exchange Traded Concepts that tracks the performance of the DEEP-US - Acquirers Deep Value Index. It was launched on Sep 23, 2014. BSMC is an actively managed fund by Brandes. It was launched on Oct 3, 2023.
Performance
DEEP vs. BSMC - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DEEP vs. BSMC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
DEEP Roundhill Acquirers Deep Value ETF | 2.58% | 5.69% | -2.97% | 14.24% |
BSMC Brandes U.S. Small-Mid Cap Value ETF | 4.40% | 15.52% | 10.21% | 11.69% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DEEP achieves a 2.58% return, which is significantly lower than BSMC's 4.40% return.
DEEP
- 1D
- 1.37%
- 1M
- -3.64%
- YTD
- 2.58%
- 6M
- 2.47%
- 1Y
- 20.09%
- 3Y*
- 6.93%
- 5Y*
- 3.03%
- 10Y*
- 7.15%
BSMC
- 1D
- 1.95%
- 1M
- -6.11%
- YTD
- 4.40%
- 6M
- 9.05%
- 1Y
- 23.80%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DEEP vs. BSMC - Expense Ratio Comparison
DEEP has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than BSMC's 0.70% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
DEEP vs. BSMC — Risk / Return Rank
DEEP
BSMC
DEEP vs. BSMC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Acquirers Deep Value ETF (DEEP) and Brandes U.S. Small-Mid Cap Value ETF (BSMC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DEEP | BSMC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.88 | 1.24 | -0.35 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.40 | 1.86 | -0.46 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.25 | -0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.41 | 1.92 | -0.51 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.13 | 7.85 | -3.72 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DEEP | BSMC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 | 1.24 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.30 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.26 | 1.07 | -0.81 |
Correlation
The correlation between DEEP and BSMC is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
DEEP vs. BSMC - Dividend Comparison
DEEP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.66%, more than BSMC's 1.00% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DEEP Roundhill Acquirers Deep Value ETF | 1.66% | 1.78% | 1.96% | 1.67% | 1.28% | 1.43% | 4.03% | 3.49% | 1.51% | 2.01% | 3.14% | 3.98% |
BSMC Brandes U.S. Small-Mid Cap Value ETF | 1.00% | 1.17% | 1.02% | 0.15% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
DEEP vs. BSMC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DEEP drawdown since its inception was -52.52%, which is greater than BSMC's maximum drawdown of -19.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DEEP and BSMC.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DEEP | BSMC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.52% | -19.15% | -33.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.91% | -12.60% | -1.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.40% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.52% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.29% | -6.19% | -0.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.53% | -2.70% | -7.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.74% | 3.07% | +1.67% |
Volatility
DEEP vs. BSMC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Roundhill Acquirers Deep Value ETF (DEEP) is 5.23%, while Brandes U.S. Small-Mid Cap Value ETF (BSMC) has a volatility of 5.58%. This indicates that DEEP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BSMC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DEEP | BSMC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.23% | 5.58% | -0.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.45% | 10.46% | +2.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.83% | 19.31% | +3.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.71% | 16.27% | +5.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.27% | 16.27% | +8.00% |