PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DEEP vs. BITQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DEEP vs. BITQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Acquirers Deep Value ETF (DEEP) and Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF (BITQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DEEP achieves a 12.39% return, which is significantly lower than BITQ's 39.79% return.


DEEP

1D
-2.02%
1M
0.72%
YTD
12.39%
6M
11.91%
1Y
27.76%
3Y*
9.78%
5Y*
3.74%
10Y*
8.15%

BITQ

1D
-2.21%
1M
11.04%
YTD
39.79%
6M
21.39%
1Y
60.30%
3Y*
58.56%
5Y*
5.19%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DEEP vs. BITQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
DEEP
Roundhill Acquirers Deep Value ETF
12.39%5.69%-2.97%22.37%-17.71%8.12%
BITQ
Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF
39.79%18.00%46.97%246.83%-83.86%-7.06%

Correlation

The correlation between DEEP and BITQ is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 13, 2021

0.51

The correlation between DEEP and BITQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (1 year) to 0.51 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DEEP vs. BITQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DEEP
BITQ

Industrials

25.8%

-

Consumer Cyclical

25.5%
4.8%

Consumer Defensive

10.5%

-

Financial Services

8.6%
67.1%

Technology

8.5%
28.1%

Healthcare

6.6%

-

Energy

5.7%

-

Basic Materials

4.8%

-

Communication Services

4.1%

-

Real Estate

3.1%

-

Utilities

-

-

Industrials

DEEP
25.8%
BITQ

-

Consumer Cyclical

DEEP
25.5%
BITQ
4.8%

Consumer Defensive

DEEP
10.5%
BITQ

-

Financial Services

DEEP
8.6%
BITQ
67.1%

Technology

DEEP
8.5%
BITQ
28.1%

Healthcare

DEEP
6.6%
BITQ

-

Energy

DEEP
5.7%
BITQ

-

Basic Materials

DEEP
4.8%
BITQ

-

Communication Services

DEEP
4.1%
BITQ

-

Real Estate

DEEP
3.1%
BITQ

-

Utilities

DEEP

-

BITQ

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DEEP vs. BITQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DEEP
DEEP Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
DEEP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DEEP Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
DEEP Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
DEEP Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
DEEP Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

BITQ
BITQ Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
BITQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BITQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
BITQ Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
BITQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
BITQ Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DEEP vs. BITQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Acquirers Deep Value ETF (DEEP) and Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF (BITQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DEEPBITQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.20

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.35

1.35

+1.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.76

2.84

+3.92

DEEP vs. BITQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DEEP Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is higher than the BITQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DEEP and BITQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DEEPBITQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.46

1.08

+0.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

0.08

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.29

0.07

+0.22

Drawdowns

DEEP vs. BITQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DEEP drawdown since its inception was -52.52%, smaller than the maximum BITQ drawdown of -90.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DEEP and BITQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DEEPBITQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.52%

-90.32%

+37.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.87%

-44.99%

+33.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.40%

-51.22%

+22.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.40%

-90.32%

+61.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.02%

-14.06%

+12.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.40%

-52.80%

+42.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.12%

21.32%

-17.20%

Volatility

DEEP vs. BITQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Roundhill Acquirers Deep Value ETF (DEEP) is 5.67%, while Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF (BITQ) has a volatility of 14.73%. This indicates that DEEP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BITQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DEEPBITQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.67%

14.73%

-9.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.29%

42.74%

-30.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.18%

56.05%

-36.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.65%

67.17%

-45.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.27%

67.23%

-42.96%

DEEP vs. BITQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

DEEP has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is lower than BITQ's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

DEEP vs. BITQ - Dividend Comparison

DEEP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.52%, while BITQ has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BITQ
Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF
0.00%0.00%0.90%1.51%0.00%3.12%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DEEP
Roundhill Acquirers Deep Value ETF
1.52%1.78%1.96%1.67%1.28%1.43%4.03%3.49%1.51%2.01%3.14%3.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


DEEP and BITQ have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BITQ has higher volatility (14.73%) compared to DEEP (5.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DEEP dropped -52.52% vs BITQ's -90.32%.

On 5-year performance, BITQ leads with 5.19% vs 3.74% for DEEP. On fees, DEEP is cheaper at 0.80% per year. On volatility, DEEP has been the lower-risk option at 5.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, BITQ has performed better with a 5.19% return vs 3.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DEEP is cheaper with a 0.80% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for BITQ.

DEEP has the higher dividend yield at 1.52%, compared with 0.00% for BITQ.

DEEP is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while BITQ is Technology Equities. DEEP tracks DEEP-US - Acquirers Deep Value Index, while BITQ tracks Bitwise Crypto Innovators 30 Total Return. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for DEEP and 0.85% for BITQ.

DEEP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.46 vs 1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DEEP and BITQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer