DEEF vs. XIDV
DEEF (Xtrackers FTSE Developed ex US Multifactor ETF) and XIDV (Franklin International Dividend Booster Index ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - DEEF tracks the FTSE Developed ex US Comprehensive Factor Net Tax (US RIC) Index while XIDV tracks the VettaFi New Frontier International Dividend Select Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, DEEF returned 21.19% vs 30.15% for XIDV. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DEEF charges 0.24%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for XIDV.
Performance
DEEF vs. XIDV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DEEF achieves a 10.05% return, which is significantly lower than XIDV's 14.85% return.
DEEF
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- -0.01%
- 6M
- 6.67%
- YTD
- 10.05%
- 1Y
- 21.19%
- 3Y*
- 15.94%
- 5Y*
- 7.92%
- 10Y*
- 8.33%
XIDV
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 1.86%
- 6M
- 13.56%
- YTD
- 14.85%
- 1Y
- 30.15%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DEEF vs. XIDV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DEEF Xtrackers FTSE Developed ex US Multifactor ETF | 10.05% | 30.06% |
XIDV Franklin International Dividend Booster Index ETF | 14.85% | 40.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between DEEF and XIDV is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 23, 2025 | 0.83 |
The correlation between DEEF and XIDV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
DEEF vs. XIDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DEEF
XIDV
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Energy
Technology
Communication Services
Healthcare
Industrials
DEEF
XIDV
Financial Services
DEEF
XIDV
Consumer Cyclical
DEEF
XIDV
Consumer Defensive
DEEF
XIDV
Basic Materials
DEEF
XIDV
Utilities
DEEF
XIDV
Real Estate
DEEF
XIDV
Energy
DEEF
XIDV
Technology
DEEF
XIDV
Communication Services
DEEF
XIDV
Healthcare
DEEF
XIDV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DEEF vs. XIDV — Risk / Return Rank
DEEF
XIDV
DEEF vs. XIDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers FTSE Developed ex US Multifactor ETF (DEEF) and Franklin International Dividend Booster Index ETF (XIDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DEEF | XIDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.44 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.00 | 3.67 | -1.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.27 | 12.90 | -6.63 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DEEF vs. XIDV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DEEF drawdown since its inception was -36.48%, which is greater than XIDV's maximum drawdown of -12.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DEEF and XIDV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DEEF | XIDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.48% | -12.15% | -24.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.64% | -8.25% | -2.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.07% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.08% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.48% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.80% | 0.00% | -3.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.06% | -1.41% | -5.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.39% | 2.34% | +1.05% |
Volatility
DEEF vs. XIDV - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers FTSE Developed ex US Multifactor ETF (DEEF) has a higher volatility of 3.67% compared to Franklin International Dividend Booster Index ETF (XIDV) at 3.06%. This indicates that DEEF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XIDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DEEF | XIDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.67% | 3.06% | +0.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.13% | 10.48% | +1.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.89% | 12.61% | +1.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.96% | 14.58% | +0.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.94% | 14.58% | +1.36% |
DEEF vs. XIDV - Expense Ratio Comparison
DEEF has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is higher than XIDV's 0.19% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
DEEF vs. XIDV - Dividend Comparison
DEEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.45%, less than XIDV's 5.94% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DEEF Xtrackers FTSE Developed ex US Multifactor ETF | 3.45% | 3.63% | 4.04% | 3.96% | 3.31% | 3.84% | 2.71% | 3.74% | 2.80% | 2.61% | 4.35% |
XIDV Franklin International Dividend Booster Index ETF | 5.94% | 4.63% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DEEF and XIDV have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DEEF has higher volatility (3.67%) compared to XIDV (3.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DEEF dropped -36.48% vs XIDV's -12.15%.
On 1-year performance, XIDV leads with 30.15% vs 21.19% for DEEF. On fees, XIDV is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, XIDV has been the lower-risk option at 3.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, XIDV has performed better with a 30.15% return vs 21.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XIDV is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.24% for DEEF.
XIDV has the higher dividend yield at 5.94%, compared with 3.45% for DEEF.
DEEF tracks FTSE Developed ex US Comprehensive Factor Net Tax (US RIC) Index, while XIDV tracks VettaFi New Frontier International Dividend Select Index. They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Bank and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for DEEF and 0.19% for XIDV.
XIDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DEEF and XIDV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer