DEEF vs. KEMX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers FTSE Developed ex US Multifactor ETF (DEEF) and KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX).

DEEF and KEMX are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. DEEF is a passively managed fund by Deutsche Bank that tracks the performance of the FTSE Developed ex US Comprehensive Factor Net Tax (US RIC) Index. It was launched on Nov 24, 2015. KEMX is a passively managed fund by CICC that tracks the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index. It was launched on Apr 12, 2019. Both DEEF and KEMX are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

DEEF vs. KEMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers FTSE Developed ex US Multifactor ETF (DEEF) and KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

DEEF vs. KEMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
DEEF Xtrackers FTSE Developed ex US Multifactor ETF	5.41%	32.36%	2.77%	16.99%	-16.94%	9.22%	7.90%	6.71%
KEMX KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF	9.35%	38.28%	0.36%	20.57%	-19.35%	10.55%	12.84%	7.93%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DEEF achieves a 5.41% return, which is significantly lower than KEMX's 9.35% return.

DEEF

• 1D: 2.85%
• 1M: -7.64%
• YTD: 5.41%
• 6M: 10.87%
• 1Y: 30.51%
• 3Y*: 16.25%
• 5Y*: 7.77%
• 10Y*: 7.98%

KEMX

• 1D: 4.34%
• 1M: -11.07%
• YTD: 9.35%
• 6M: 21.09%
• 1Y: 50.32%
• 3Y*: 20.32%
• 5Y*: 9.05%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DEEF vs. KEMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DEEF has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than KEMX's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

KEMX

KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF

DEEF

Xtrackers FTSE Developed ex US Multifactor ETF

Return for Risk

DEEF vs. KEMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DEEF

DEEF Risk / Return Rank: 90
DEEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
DEEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
DEEF Omega Ratio Rank: 92
DEEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
DEEF Martin Ratio Rank: 89

KEMX

KEMX Risk / Return Rank: 94
KEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
KEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
KEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 94
KEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
KEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DEEF vs. KEMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers FTSE Developed ex US Multifactor ETF (DEEF) and KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DEEF	KEMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.04	2.36	-0.33
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.70	3.00	-0.30
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.44	-0.03
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.79	3.25	-0.46
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	11.11	13.60	-2.49
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DEEF vs. KEMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DEEF Sharpe Ratio is 2.04, which is comparable to the KEMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DEEF and KEMX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DEEF	KEMX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.04	2.36	-0.33
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.53	0.52	+0.01
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.49	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.48	0.50	-0.03

Correlation

The correlation between DEEF and KEMX is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

DEEF vs. KEMX - Dividend Comparison

DEEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.53%, more than KEMX's 3.00% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
DEEF Xtrackers FTSE Developed ex US Multifactor ETF	3.53%	3.63%	4.04%	3.96%	3.31%	3.84%	2.71%	3.74%	2.80%	2.61%	4.35%
KEMX KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF	3.00%	3.28%	3.39%	2.00%	4.10%	4.79%	1.69%	2.77%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

DEEF vs. KEMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DEEF drawdown since its inception was -36.48%, smaller than the maximum KEMX drawdown of -38.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DEEF and KEMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	DEEF	KEMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.48%	-38.80%	+2.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.64%	-15.36%	+4.72%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.08%	-30.85%	-0.23%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.48%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.85%	-11.68%	+3.83%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.15%	-9.02%	+1.87%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.67%	3.67%	-1.00%

Volatility

DEEF vs. KEMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers FTSE Developed ex US Multifactor ETF (DEEF) is 7.76%, while KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX) has a volatility of 12.58%. This indicates that DEEF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KEMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DEEF	KEMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.76%	12.58%	-4.82%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.43%	16.96%	-6.53%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.07%	21.39%	-6.32%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.87%	17.55%	-2.68%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.24%	20.61%	-4.37%