PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
DEEF vs. DWMF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

DEEF vs. DWMF

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

DEEF (Xtrackers FTSE Developed ex US Multifactor ETF) and DWMF (WisdomTree International Multifactor Fund) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. DEEF is passively managed, while DWMF is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, DEEF returned 7.34%/yr vs 8.74%/yr for DWMF. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DEEF charges 0.24%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for DWMF.

Performance

DEEF vs. DWMF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers FTSE Developed ex US Multifactor ETF (DEEF) and WisdomTree International Multifactor Fund (DWMF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DEEF achieves a 8.64% return, which is significantly higher than DWMF's 5.51% return.

DEEF

1D
0.46%
1M
-2.50%
YTD
8.64%
6M
8.32%
1Y
20.84%
3Y*
17.09%
5Y*
7.34%
10Y*
9.04%

DWMF

1D
0.86%
1M
1.37%
YTD
5.51%
6M
4.95%
1Y
12.14%
3Y*
14.33%
5Y*
8.74%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DEEF vs. DWMF - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
DEEF
Xtrackers FTSE Developed ex US Multifactor ETF		8.64%32.36%2.77%16.99%-16.94%9.22%7.90%19.30%-12.11%
DWMF
WisdomTree International Multifactor Fund		5.51%24.42%10.22%10.78%-7.31%11.24%-1.18%16.10%-7.26%

Correlation

The correlation between DEEF and DWMF is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 10, 2018

0.85

The correlation between DEEF and DWMF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

DEEF vs. DWMF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
DEEF
DWMF

Industrials

25.0%
19.1%

Financial Services

14.2%
19.9%

Consumer Cyclical

10.8%
5.8%

Consumer Defensive

10.0%
11.3%

Basic Materials

9.2%
3.9%

Utilities

6.9%
8.9%

Real Estate

5.5%
6.3%

Energy

5.1%
1.9%

Technology

4.8%
4.5%

Communication Services

4.4%
9.4%

Healthcare

4.2%
9.1%

Industrials

DEEF
25.0%
DWMF
19.1%

Financial Services

DEEF
14.2%
DWMF
19.9%

Consumer Cyclical

DEEF
10.8%
DWMF
5.8%

Consumer Defensive

DEEF
10.0%
DWMF
11.3%

Basic Materials

DEEF
9.2%
DWMF
3.9%

Utilities

DEEF
6.9%
DWMF
8.9%

Real Estate

DEEF
5.5%
DWMF
6.3%

Energy

DEEF
5.1%
DWMF
1.9%

Technology

DEEF
4.8%
DWMF
4.5%

Communication Services

DEEF
4.4%
DWMF
9.4%

Healthcare

DEEF
4.2%
DWMF
9.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Xtrackers FTSE Developed ex US Multifactor ETF

WisdomTree International Multifactor Fund

Often compared with DEEF:
DEEF vs. QLVDDEEF vs. VOODEEF vs. VYMIDEEF vs. HDEFDEEF vs. EFAVDEEF vs. SPYDEEF vs. VXUS
Often compared with DWMF:
DWMF vs. BROIXDWMF vs. FEPDWMF vs. FEUZDWMF vs. AIVIDWMF vs. DFIVDWMF vs. VEADWMF vs. VXUS

Return for Risk

DEEF vs. DWMF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
DEEF
DEEF Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
DEEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DEEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
DEEF Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
DEEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
DEEF Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
DWMF
DWMF Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
DWMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DWMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
DWMF Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
DWMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
DWMF Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DEEF vs. DWMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers FTSE Developed ex US Multifactor ETF (DEEF) and WisdomTree International Multifactor Fund (DWMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

DEEFDWMFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.51
1.05

+0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.11
1.54

+0.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.19

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.97

1.40

+0.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.43

3.81

+2.63

DEEF vs. DWMF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DEEF Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is higher than the DWMF Sharpe Ratio of 1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DEEF and DWMF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DEEF vs. DWMF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DEEF drawdown since its inception was -36.48%, which is greater than DWMF's maximum drawdown of -29.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DEEF and DWMF.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

DEEFDWMFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.48%

-29.72%

-6.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.64%

-8.74%

-1.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.07%

-8.74%

-2.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.08%

-17.00%

-14.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.48%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.03%

-3.81%

-1.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.07%

-3.90%

-3.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.25%

3.20%

+0.05%

Volatility

DEEF vs. DWMF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers FTSE Developed ex US Multifactor ETF (DEEF) is 4.03%, while WisdomTree International Multifactor Fund (DWMF) has a volatility of 4.71%. This indicates that DEEF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DWMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

DEEFDWMFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.03%

4.71%

-0.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.09%

9.62%

+2.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.85%

11.64%

+2.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.98%

11.37%

+3.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.04%

14.14%

+1.90%

DEEF vs. DWMF - Expense Ratio Comparison

DEEF has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than DWMF's 0.38% expense ratio.

Dividends

DEEF vs. DWMF - Dividend Comparison

DEEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.49%, more than DWMF's 3.11% yield.

PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
DEEF
Xtrackers FTSE Developed ex US Multifactor ETF		3.49%3.63%4.04%3.96%3.31%3.84%2.71%3.74%2.80%2.61%4.35%
DWMF
WisdomTree International Multifactor Fund		3.11%2.80%3.50%4.01%3.41%3.54%2.06%2.77%1.15%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

DEEF and DWMF have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DWMF has higher volatility (4.71%) compared to DEEF (4.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DEEF dropped -36.48% vs DWMF's -29.72%.

On 5-year performance, DWMF leads with 8.74% vs 7.34% for DEEF. On fees, DEEF is cheaper at 0.24% per year. On volatility, DEEF has been the lower-risk option at 4.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DWMF has performed better with a 8.74% return vs 7.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DEEF is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for DWMF.

DEEF has the higher dividend yield at 3.49%, compared with 3.11% for DWMF.

They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Bank and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for DEEF and 0.38% for DWMF.

DEEF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.51 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DEEF and DWMF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer