PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DECO vs. XLE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DECO vs. XLE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Galaxy Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF (DECO) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DECO achieves a 79.56% return, which is significantly higher than XLE's 32.17% return.


DECO

1D
0.01%
1M
39.50%
YTD
79.56%
6M
62.77%
1Y
167.73%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XLE

1D
1.29%
1M
-1.14%
YTD
32.17%
6M
29.80%
1Y
45.00%
3Y*
17.46%
5Y*
20.44%
10Y*
10.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DECO vs. XLE - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DECO and XLE is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2024

0.10

The correlation between DECO and XLE shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.10 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DECO vs. XLE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DECO
XLE

Technology

47.6%

-

Financial Services

44.9%

-

Industrials

5.2%

-

Basic Materials

1.8%

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

100.0%

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

DECO
47.6%
XLE

-

Financial Services

DECO
44.9%
XLE

-

Industrials

DECO
5.2%
XLE

-

Basic Materials

DECO
1.8%
XLE

-

Communication Services

DECO

-

XLE

-

Consumer Cyclical

DECO

-

XLE

-

Consumer Defensive

DECO

-

XLE

-

Energy

DECO

-

XLE
100.0%

Healthcare

DECO

-

XLE

-

Real Estate

DECO

-

XLE

-

Utilities

DECO

-

XLE

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DECO vs. XLE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DECO
DECO Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
DECO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DECO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
DECO Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
DECO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
DECO Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

XLE
XLE Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
XLE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLE Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
XLE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLE Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DECO vs. XLE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Galaxy Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF (DECO) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DECOXLEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.35

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.59

3.75

+2.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.43

10.92

+7.51

DECO vs. XLE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DECO Sharpe Ratio is 3.80, which is higher than the XLE Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DECO and XLE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DECOXLEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.80

2.21

+1.60

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.96

0.31

+1.65

Drawdowns

DECO vs. XLE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DECO drawdown since its inception was -47.71%, smaller than the maximum XLE drawdown of -71.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DECO and XLE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DECOXLEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.71%

-71.26%

+23.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.60%

-12.05%

-13.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.33%

-6.15%

+5.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.67%

-17.98%

+6.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.14%

4.14%

+5.00%

Volatility

DECO vs. XLE - Volatility Comparison

State Street Galaxy Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF (DECO) has a higher volatility of 11.53% compared to State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) at 8.25%. This indicates that DECO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DECOXLEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.53%

8.25%

+3.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.83%

16.58%

+17.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.46%

20.53%

+23.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

51.50%

26.02%

+25.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

51.50%

29.59%

+21.91%

DECO vs. XLE - Expense Ratio Comparison

DECO has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than XLE's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

DECO vs. XLE - Dividend Comparison

DECO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.64%, less than XLE's 2.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DECO
State Street Galaxy Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF
0.64%1.16%1.73%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XLE
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF
2.54%3.28%3.36%3.55%3.68%4.21%5.62%6.72%3.54%3.03%2.26%3.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


DECO and XLE have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DECO has higher volatility (11.53%) compared to XLE (8.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DECO dropped -47.71% vs XLE's -71.26%.

On 1-year performance, DECO leads with 167.73% vs 45.00% for XLE. On fees, XLE is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLE has been the lower-risk option at 8.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DECO has performed better with a 167.73% return vs 45.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLE is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for DECO.

XLE has the higher dividend yield at 2.54%, compared with 0.64% for DECO.

DECO is categorized as Blockchain, while XLE is Energy Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for DECO and 0.08% for XLE.

DECO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.80 vs 2.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DECO and XLE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer