DECO vs. IAK
DECO (State Street Galaxy Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF) and IAK (iShares U.S. Insurance ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DECO is a Blockchain fund actively managed by State Street, while IAK is a Financials Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Select Insurance Index. DECO is actively managed, while IAK is passively managed. Over the past year, DECO returned 113.56% vs 19.67% for IAK. Their -0.01 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. DECO charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for IAK.
Performance
DECO vs. IAK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DECO achieves a 68.95% return, which is significantly higher than IAK's 10.11% return.
DECO
- 1D
- 4.77%
- 1M
- 1.07%
- 6M
- 51.40%
- YTD
- 68.95%
- 1Y
- 113.56%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 83.69%
IAK
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- -0.03%
- 6M
- 12.56%
- YTD
- 10.11%
- 1Y
- 19.67%
- 3Y*
- 19.67%
- 5Y*
- 15.99%
- 10Y*
- 13.18%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.39%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $75.57K | $87.99K | $120.06K | |
| $15.27M | $20.59M | $12.29M |
DECO vs. IAK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
DECO State Street Galaxy Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF | 68.95% | 42.48% | 31.48% |
IAK iShares U.S. Insurance ETF | 10.11% | 9.50% | -0.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between DECO and IAK is -0.25, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2024 | -0.01 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between DECO and IAK has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.01 to -0.25, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.
DECO vs. IAK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DECO
IAK
Financial Services
Technology
-
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
DECO
IAK
Technology
DECO
IAK
-
Industrials
DECO
IAK
-
Basic Materials
DECO
IAK
-
Communication Services
DECO
-
IAK
-
Consumer Cyclical
DECO
-
IAK
-
Consumer Defensive
DECO
-
IAK
-
Energy
DECO
-
IAK
-
Healthcare
DECO
-
IAK
Real Estate
DECO
-
IAK
-
Utilities
DECO
-
IAK
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DECO vs. IAK — Risk / Return Rank
DECO
IAK
DECO vs. IAK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Galaxy Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF (DECO) and iShares U.S. Insurance ETF (IAK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DECO | IAK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.22 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.46 | 2.59 | +1.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.90 | 6.29 | +5.60 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DECO vs. IAK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DECO drawdown since its inception was -47.71%, smaller than the maximum IAK drawdown of -77.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DECO and IAK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DECO | IAK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.71% | -77.38% | +29.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.60% | -7.62% | -17.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -11.58% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -14.76% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -44.95% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.44% | -3.20% | -4.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.23% | -16.01% | +4.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.58% | 3.13% | +6.45% |
Volatility
DECO vs. IAK - Volatility Comparison
State Street Galaxy Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF (DECO) has a higher volatility of 19.46% compared to iShares U.S. Insurance ETF (IAK) at 6.56%. This indicates that DECO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IAK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DECO | IAK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.46% | 6.56% | +12.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.69% | 12.42% | +24.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.20% | 15.99% | +31.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 51.90% | 18.13% | +33.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 51.90% | 20.92% | +30.98% |
DECO vs. IAK - Expense Ratio Comparison
DECO has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than IAK's 0.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
DECO vs. IAK - Dividend Comparison
DECO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.68%, less than IAK's 2.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DECO State Street Galaxy Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF | 0.68% | 1.16% | 1.73% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IAK iShares U.S. Insurance ETF | 2.42% | 1.69% | 1.49% | 1.44% | 1.69% | 2.26% | 2.07% | 1.84% | 2.33% | 1.62% | 1.68% | 1.62% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DECO and IAK have a correlation of -0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DECO has higher volatility (19.46%) compared to IAK (6.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DECO dropped -47.71% vs IAK's -77.38%.
On 1-year performance, DECO leads with 113.56% vs 19.67% for IAK. On fees, IAK is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, IAK has been the lower-risk option at 6.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, DECO has performed better with a 113.56% return vs 19.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IAK is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for DECO.
IAK has the higher dividend yield at 2.42%, compared with 0.68% for DECO.
DECO is categorized as Blockchain, while IAK is Financials Equities. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for DECO and 0.38% for IAK.
DECO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DECO and IAK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer