DECO vs. CRCD
DECO (State Street Galaxy Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF) and CRCD (T-REX 2X Inverse CRCL Daily Target ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DECO is a Blockchain fund actively managed by State Street, while CRCD is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by T-Rex. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.59, they often move in opposite directions. DECO charges 0.65%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for CRCD.
Performance
DECO vs. CRCD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DECO achieves a 74.25% return, which is significantly higher than CRCD's -82.39% return.
DECO
- 1D
- -2.84%
- 1M
- 11.41%
- YTD
- 74.25%
- 6M
- 65.42%
- 1Y
- 146.58%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CRCD
- 1D
- 12.24%
- 1M
- 110.07%
- YTD
- -82.39%
- 6M
- -80.91%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DECO vs. CRCD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DECO State Street Galaxy Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF | 74.25% | -1.32% |
CRCD T-REX 2X Inverse CRCL Daily Target ETF | -82.39% | 38.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between DECO and CRCD is -0.59, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2025 | -0.59 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DECO vs. CRCD — Risk / Return Rank
DECO
CRCD
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
DECO vs. CRCD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Galaxy Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF (DECO) and T-REX 2X Inverse CRCL Daily Target ETF (CRCD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DECO | CRCD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.76 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.03 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DECO vs. CRCD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DECO drawdown since its inception was -47.71%, smaller than the maximum CRCD drawdown of -96.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DECO and CRCD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DECO | CRCD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.71% | -96.95% | +49.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.60% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.54% | -91.65% | +87.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.40% | -57.48% | +46.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.18% | — | — |
Volatility
DECO vs. CRCD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DECO | CRCD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.99% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.79% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.95% | 200.76% | -155.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 51.31% | 200.76% | -149.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 51.31% | 200.76% | -149.45% |
DECO vs. CRCD - Expense Ratio Comparison
DECO has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than CRCD's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
DECO vs. CRCD - Dividend Comparison
DECO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.66%, while CRCD has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
CRCD T-REX 2X Inverse CRCL Daily Target ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DECO State Street Galaxy Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF | 0.66% | 1.16% | 1.73% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DECO and CRCD have a correlation of -0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DECO is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DECO is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for CRCD.
DECO has the higher dividend yield at 0.66%, compared with 0.00% for CRCD.
DECO is categorized as Blockchain, while CRCD is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: State Street and T-Rex. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for DECO and 1.50% for CRCD.
Find the right allocation for DECO and CRCD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer