DEC.L vs. PG
DEC.L (Diversified Energy Company plc) and PG (The Procter & Gamble Company) are both stocks. DEC.L operates in Oil & Gas E&P (Energy), while PG operates in Household & Personal Products (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 5 years, DEC.L returned -9.49%/yr vs 5.81%/yr for PG. At a correlation of -0.04, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
DEC.L vs. PG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
DEC.L is traded in GBp, while PG is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the PG values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DEC.L achieves a -0.24% return, which is significantly lower than PG's 6.47% return.
DEC.L
- 1D
- -3.56%
- 1M
- -9.31%
- YTD
- -0.24%
- 6M
- -1.16%
- 1Y
- 7.92%
- 3Y*
- -11.49%
- 5Y*
- -9.49%
- 10Y*
- —
PG
- 1D
- 0.94%
- 1M
- 4.81%
- YTD
- 6.47%
- 6M
- 6.01%
- 1Y
- -2.78%
- 3Y*
- 1.60%
- 5Y*
- 5.81%
- 10Y*
- 9.51%
DEC.L vs. PG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DEC.L Diversified Energy Company plc | -0.24% | -13.52% | 33.99% | -51.82% | 11.95% | -7.26% | 6.57% | -8.61% | 48.06% | 17.61% |
PG The Procter & Gamble Company | 6.47% | -18.51% | 19.30% | -5.81% | 6.24% | 21.66% | 10.80% | 34.39% | 9.71% | -0.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between DEC.L and PG is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.10 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2017 | -0.04 |
Fundamentals
DEC.L:
£765.64M
PG:
$361.53B
DEC.L:
$3.52
PG:
$5.23
DEC.L:
3.91
PG:
28.63
DEC.L:
0.02
PG:
7.00
DEC.L:
0.41
PG:
4.20
DEC.L:
1.04
PG:
6.70
DEC.L:
$2.40B
PG:
$86.72B
DEC.L:
$520.54M
PG:
$43.64B
DEC.L:
$874.38M
PG:
$22.63B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DEC.L vs. PG — Risk / Return Rank
DEC.L
PG
DEC.L vs. PG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Diversified Energy Company plc (DEC.L) and The Procter & Gamble Company (PG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DEC.L | PG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.76 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 0.98 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.31 | -0.27 | +0.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.59 | -0.53 | +1.12 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DEC.L vs. PG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DEC.L drawdown since its inception was -70.01%, which is greater than PG's maximum drawdown of -29.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DEC.L and PG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DEC.L | PG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.01% | -29.27% | -40.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.65% | -15.31% | -10.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -55.85% | -26.20% | -29.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -70.01% | -26.20% | -43.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -27.95% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -54.25% | -18.52% | -35.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.57% | -7.85% | -19.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.39% | 8.01% | +5.38% |
Volatility
DEC.L vs. PG - Volatility Comparison
Diversified Energy Company plc (DEC.L) has a higher volatility of 10.81% compared to The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) at 7.42%. This indicates that DEC.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DEC.L | PG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.81% | 7.42% | +3.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.76% | 15.35% | +16.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.95% | 18.93% | +21.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.71% | 18.23% | +20.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.40% | 20.22% | +17.18% |
Dividends
DEC.L vs. PG - Dividend Comparison
DEC.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.37%, more than PG's 2.85% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DEC.L Diversified Energy Company plc | 8.37% | 8.15% | 7.96% | 0.93% | 0.44% | 0.41% | 0.39% | 0.42% | 0.25% | 0.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PG The Procter & Gamble Company | 2.85% | 2.91% | 2.36% | 2.55% | 2.38% | 2.08% | 2.24% | 2.37% | 3.09% | 2.98% | 3.18% | 3.31% |
Financials
DEC.L vs. PG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Diversified Energy Company plc and The Procter & Gamble Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
DEC.L vs. PG - Profitability Comparison
DEC.L - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Diversified Energy Company plc reported a gross profit of -21.38M and revenue of 871.15M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -2.5%.
PG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Procter & Gamble Company reported a gross profit of 10.51B and revenue of 21.24B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.5%.
DEC.L - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Diversified Energy Company plc reported an operating income of 110.45M and revenue of 871.15M, resulting in an operating margin of 12.7%.
PG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Procter & Gamble Company reported an operating income of 4.58B and revenue of 21.24B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.6%.
DEC.L - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Diversified Energy Company plc reported a net income of 375.18M and revenue of 871.15M, resulting in a net margin of 43.1%.
PG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Procter & Gamble Company reported a net income of 18.50M and revenue of 21.24B, resulting in a net margin of 0.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
DEC.L and PG have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for DEC.L and PG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer