DEA vs. FOOD.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Easterly Government Properties, Inc. (DEA) and Goodfood Market Corp. (FOOD.TO).
Performance
DEA vs. FOOD.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DEA vs. FOOD.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DEA Easterly Government Properties, Inc. | 1.79% | -18.63% | -7.95% | 1.82% | -34.04% | 6.32% | -0.31% | 59.49% | -22.49% | 11.89% |
FOOD.TO Goodfood Market Corp. | -40.99% | -7.62% | 42.85% | -44.32% | -89.68% | -66.17% | 294.97% | 23.08% | -0.30% | 135.65% |
Different Trading Currencies
DEA is traded in USD, while FOOD.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the FOOD.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Fundamentals
DEA:
$978.55M
FOOD.TO:
CA$19.70M
DEA:
$0.29
FOOD.TO:
-CA$0.09
DEA:
2.83
FOOD.TO:
0.17
DEA:
$336.10M
FOOD.TO:
CA$113.76M
DEA:
$224.69M
FOOD.TO:
CA$47.03M
DEA:
$230.45M
FOOD.TO:
CA$3.21M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DEA achieves a 1.79% return, which is significantly higher than FOOD.TO's -40.99% return. Over the past 10 years, DEA has outperformed FOOD.TO with an annualized return of -1.43%, while FOOD.TO has yielded a comparatively lower -16.06% annualized return.
DEA
- 1D
- -1.31%
- 1M
- -8.53%
- YTD
- 1.79%
- 6M
- -2.90%
- 1Y
- -13.07%
- 3Y*
- -7.48%
- 5Y*
- -10.18%
- 10Y*
- -1.43%
FOOD.TO
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- -21.19%
- YTD
- -40.99%
- 6M
- -33.09%
- 1Y
- -4.21%
- 3Y*
- -29.69%
- 5Y*
- -53.88%
- 10Y*
- -16.06%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DEA vs. FOOD.TO — Risk / Return Rank
DEA
FOOD.TO
DEA vs. FOOD.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Easterly Government Properties, Inc. (DEA) and Goodfood Market Corp. (FOOD.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DEA | FOOD.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.48 | -0.05 | -0.43 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.47 | 0.62 | -1.10 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.08 | -0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.54 | -0.59 | +0.05 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.01 | -1.11 | +0.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DEA | FOOD.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.48 | -0.05 | -0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.42 | -0.70 | +0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.06 | -0.24 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.02 | -0.33 | +0.35 |
Correlation
The correlation between DEA and FOOD.TO is 0.08, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
DEA vs. FOOD.TO - Dividend Comparison
DEA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.51%, while FOOD.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DEA Easterly Government Properties, Inc. | 8.51% | 9.50% | 9.33% | 7.89% | 7.43% | 4.58% | 4.59% | 4.38% | 6.63% | 4.69% | 4.60% | 3.14% |
FOOD.TO Goodfood Market Corp. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
DEA vs. FOOD.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DEA drawdown since its inception was -62.19%, smaller than the maximum FOOD.TO drawdown of -99.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DEA and FOOD.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DEA | FOOD.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.19% | -99.07% | +36.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.55% | -46.38% | +21.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -56.38% | -98.74% | +42.36% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -62.19% | -99.07% | +36.88% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -56.52% | -98.62% | +42.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.46% | -59.02% | +36.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.13% | 25.22% | -12.09% |
Volatility
DEA vs. FOOD.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Easterly Government Properties, Inc. (DEA) is 4.58%, while Goodfood Market Corp. (FOOD.TO) has a volatility of 19.11%. This indicates that DEA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FOOD.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DEA | FOOD.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.58% | 19.11% | -14.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.13% | 46.87% | -31.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.48% | 91.73% | -64.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.56% | 76.99% | -52.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.29% | 75.62% | -51.33% |
Financials
DEA vs. FOOD.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Easterly Government Properties, Inc. and Goodfood Market Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities