DDX vs. AOK
DDX (Defined Duration 10 ETF) and AOK (iShares Core Conservative Allocation ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. DDX is actively managed, while AOK is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, DDX returned 8.16%/yr vs 9.28%/yr for AOK. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.25% expense ratio.
Performance
DDX vs. AOK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DDX achieves a 4.86% return, which is significantly higher than AOK's 4.26% return.
DDX
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- 2.02%
- YTD
- 4.86%
- 6M
- 5.43%
- 1Y
- 12.79%
- 3Y*
- 8.16%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AOK
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- 1.66%
- YTD
- 4.26%
- 6M
- 4.14%
- 1Y
- 12.11%
- 3Y*
- 9.28%
- 5Y*
- 3.71%
- 10Y*
- 5.14%
DDX vs. AOK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DDX Defined Duration 10 ETF | 4.86% | 12.02% | 2.93% | 10.48% | -16.19% | 1.34% |
AOK iShares Core Conservative Allocation ETF | 4.26% | 11.26% | 6.58% | 10.85% | -14.16% | 1.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between DDX and AOK is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 21, 2021 | 0.93 |
The correlation between DDX and AOK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
DDX vs. AOK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DDX
AOK
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Financial Services
DDX
AOK
Technology
DDX
AOK
Industrials
DDX
AOK
Healthcare
DDX
AOK
Consumer Cyclical
DDX
AOK
Consumer Defensive
DDX
AOK
Communication Services
DDX
AOK
Energy
DDX
AOK
Basic Materials
DDX
AOK
Utilities
DDX
AOK
Real Estate
DDX
AOK
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DDX vs. AOK — Risk / Return Rank
DDX
AOK
DDX vs. AOK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defined Duration 10 ETF (DDX) and iShares Core Conservative Allocation ETF (AOK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DDX | AOK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.41 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.91 | 2.70 | +0.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.71 | 11.50 | +0.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DDX | AOK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.35 | 2.11 | +0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.53 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.77 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | 0.71 | -0.35 |
Drawdowns
DDX vs. AOK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DDX drawdown since its inception was -21.27%, which is greater than AOK's maximum drawdown of -18.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDX and AOK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DDX | AOK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.27% | -18.94% | -2.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.41% | -4.50% | +0.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.17% | -6.37% | +0.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.94% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -18.94% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.24% | -0.41% | +0.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.12% | -2.37% | -4.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.09% | 1.06% | +0.03% |
Volatility
DDX vs. AOK - Volatility Comparison
Defined Duration 10 ETF (DDX) and iShares Core Conservative Allocation ETF (AOK) have volatilities of 2.03% and 1.97%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DDX | AOK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.03% | 1.97% | +0.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.46% | 4.47% | -0.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.47% | 5.76% | -0.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.48% | 7.10% | +0.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.48% | 6.71% | +0.77% |
DDX vs. AOK - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both DDX and AOK have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
DDX vs. AOK - Dividend Comparison
DDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.39%, more than AOK's 3.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AOK iShares Core Conservative Allocation ETF | 3.28% | 3.28% | 3.23% | 2.93% | 2.25% | 1.55% | 2.10% | 2.71% | 2.68% | 2.91% | 2.14% | 2.02% |
DDX Defined Duration 10 ETF | 3.39% | 3.17% | 3.11% | 2.41% | 1.38% | 1.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, DDX and AOK move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
DDX has higher volatility (2.03%) compared to AOK (1.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DDX dropped -21.27% vs AOK's -18.94%.
On 3-year performance, AOK leads with 9.28% vs 8.16% for DDX. Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, AOK has performed better with a 9.28% return vs 8.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DDX and AOK have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.
DDX has the higher dividend yield at 3.39%, compared with 3.28% for AOK.
They also come from different issuers: Discipline Funds and iShares.
DDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 2.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DDX and AOK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer