DDWM vs. GDMN

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

DDWM (WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International Equity Fund) and GDMN (WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - DDWM is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International Equity Index, while GDMN is a Commodities fund actively managed by WisdomTree. DDWM is passively managed, while GDMN is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, DDWM returned 17.74%/yr vs 52.64%/yr for GDMN. Their 0.36 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. DDWM charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for GDMN.

Performance

DDWM vs. GDMN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International Equity Fund (DDWM) and WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DDWM achieves a 9.49% return, which is significantly higher than GDMN's -22.58% return.

DDWM

• 1D: -0.41%
• 1M: 0.71%
• 6M: 5.28%
• YTD: 9.49%
• 1Y: 21.99%
• 3Y*: 17.74%
• 5Y*: 13.00%
• 10Y*: 10.64%
• ALL TIME*: 10.83%

GDMN

• 1D: -3.90%
• 1M: -5.95%
• 6M: -33.98%
• YTD: -22.58%
• 1Y: 46.98%
• 3Y*: 52.64%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 30.74%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
DDWM WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International Equity Fund	$5.12M	$4.14M	$4.85M
GDMN WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund	$1.53M	$2.31M	$3.48M

DDWM vs. GDMN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
DDWM WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International Equity Fund	9.49%	30.07%	10.70%	15.25%	-0.77%	1.06%
GDMN WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund	-22.58%	237.09%	28.23%	12.97%	-14.62%	6.93%

Correlation

The correlation between DDWM and GDMN is 0.47, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.47
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.39
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2021	0.36

The correlation between DDWM and GDMN shifts across timeframes, from 0.36 (all time) to 0.47 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DDWM vs. GDMN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DDWM	GDMN
Industrials	19.3%	-
Financial Services	18.2%	-
Consumer Cyclical	9.3%	-
Healthcare	8.2%	-
Technology	7.4%	-
Consumer Defensive	7.0%	-
Basic Materials	5.8%	100.0%
Utilities	5.2%	-
Communication Services	4.7%	-
Energy	3.7%	-
Real Estate	2.7%	-

Return for Risk

DDWM vs. GDMN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DDWM

DDWM Risk / Return Rank: 68
DDWM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
DDWM Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
DDWM Omega Ratio Rank: 76
DDWM Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
DDWM Martin Ratio Rank: 61

GDMN

GDMN Risk / Return Rank: 33
GDMN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
GDMN Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
GDMN Omega Ratio Rank: 39
GDMN Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
GDMN Martin Ratio Rank: 26

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DDWM vs. GDMN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International Equity Fund (DDWM) and WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DDWM	GDMN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.68	0.82	+0.86
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.32	1.32	+1.00
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.18	+0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.04	1.02	+1.02
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.35	2.14	+5.21

DDWM vs. GDMN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DDWM Sharpe Ratio is 1.68, which is higher than the GDMN Sharpe Ratio of 0.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DDWM and GDMN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DDWM vs. GDMN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DDWM drawdown since its inception was -35.00%, smaller than the maximum GDMN drawdown of -52.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDWM and GDMN.

Drawdown Indicators

	DDWM	GDMN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.00%	-52.82%	+17.82%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.56%	-52.02%	+41.46%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.34%	-52.02%	+39.68%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-14.79%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.00%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.41%	-49.17%	+48.76%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.01%	-19.83%	+15.82%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.93%	24.76%	-21.83%

Volatility

DDWM vs. GDMN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International Equity Fund (DDWM) is 3.29%, while WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN) has a volatility of 15.83%. This indicates that DDWM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDMN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DDWM	GDMN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.29%	15.83%	-12.54%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.05%	54.36%	-43.31%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.87%	65.01%	-52.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.37%	48.35%	-34.98%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.07%	48.35%	-33.28%

DDWM vs. GDMN - Expense Ratio Comparison

DDWM has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than GDMN's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

DDWM vs. GDMN - Dividend Comparison

DDWM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.52%, less than GDMN's 3.49% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
DDWM WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International Equity Fund	2.52%	2.47%	3.57%	4.46%	4.28%	3.73%	3.52%	3.63%	4.40%	2.65%	4.00%
GDMN WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund	3.49%	2.70%	9.44%	7.69%	1.44%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DDWM and GDMN in my portfolio?

DDWM and GDMN have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DDWM or GDMN?

GDMN has higher volatility (15.83%) compared to DDWM (3.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DDWM dropped -35.00% vs GDMN's -52.82%.

Which ETF is better, DDWM or GDMN?

On 3-year performance, GDMN leads with 52.64% vs 17.74% for DDWM. On fees, DDWM is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, DDWM has been the lower-risk option at 3.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DDWM or GDMN?

Over the 3-year period, GDMN has performed better with a 52.64% return vs 17.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DDWM or GDMN?

DDWM is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for GDMN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DDWM or GDMN?

GDMN has the higher dividend yield at 3.49%, compared with 2.52% for DDWM.

What is the main difference between DDWM and GDMN?

DDWM is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while GDMN is Commodities. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for DDWM and 0.45% for GDMN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DDWM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs 0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.