DDWM vs. DHS
DDWM (WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International Equity Fund) and DHS (WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - DDWM is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International Equity Index, while DHS is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree U.S. High Dividend Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DDWM returned 10.64%/yr vs 9.68%/yr for DHS. Their 0.65 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. DDWM charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for DHS.
Performance
DDWM vs. DHS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DDWM achieves a 9.49% return, which is significantly lower than DHS's 16.66% return. Over the past 10 years, DDWM has outperformed DHS with an annualized return of 10.64%, while DHS has yielded a comparatively lower 9.68% annualized return.
DDWM
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- 0.71%
- 6M
- 5.28%
- YTD
- 9.49%
- 1Y
- 21.99%
- 3Y*
- 17.74%
- 5Y*
- 13.00%
- 10Y*
- 10.64%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.83%
DHS
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- 1.58%
- 6M
- 9.76%
- YTD
- 16.66%
- 1Y
- 25.21%
- 3Y*
- 16.49%
- 5Y*
- 12.26%
- 10Y*
- 9.68%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.24%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $5.12M | $4.14M | $4.85M | |
| $5.32M | $3.61M | $2.98M |
DDWM vs. DHS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DDWM WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International Equity Fund | 9.49% | 30.07% | 10.70% | 15.25% | -0.77% | 14.84% | -4.56% | 21.43% | -11.75% | 18.80% |
DHS WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund | 16.66% | 12.87% | 18.02% | -0.19% | 7.97% | 23.20% | -5.70% | 22.59% | -7.41% | 11.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between DDWM and DHS is 0.44, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.44 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.54 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.62 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2016 | 0.65 |
Over the past year, the correlation between DDWM and DHS has dropped to 0.44 - well below their long-term average of 0.65, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
DDWM vs. DHS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DDWM
DHS
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Utilities
Communication Services
Energy
Real Estate
Industrials
DDWM
DHS
Financial Services
DDWM
DHS
Consumer Cyclical
DDWM
DHS
Healthcare
DDWM
DHS
Technology
DDWM
DHS
Consumer Defensive
DDWM
DHS
Basic Materials
DDWM
DHS
Utilities
DDWM
DHS
Communication Services
DDWM
DHS
Energy
DDWM
DHS
Real Estate
DDWM
DHS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DDWM vs. DHS — Risk / Return Rank
DDWM
DHS
DDWM vs. DHS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International Equity Fund (DDWM) and WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund (DHS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DDWM | DHS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.42 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.04 | 3.97 | -1.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.35 | 14.58 | -7.23 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DDWM vs. DHS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DDWM drawdown since its inception was -35.00%, smaller than the maximum DHS drawdown of -67.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDWM and DHS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DDWM | DHS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.00% | -67.25% | +32.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.56% | -6.30% | -4.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.34% | -11.87% | -0.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.79% | -15.28% | +0.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.00% | -37.35% | +2.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.41% | -2.23% | +1.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.01% | -9.48% | +5.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.93% | 1.71% | +1.22% |
Volatility
DDWM vs. DHS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International Equity Fund (DDWM) is 3.29%, while WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund (DHS) has a volatility of 3.88%. This indicates that DDWM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DHS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DDWM | DHS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.29% | 3.88% | -0.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.05% | 7.92% | +3.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.87% | 10.43% | +2.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.37% | 13.91% | -0.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.07% | 16.09% | -1.02% |
DDWM vs. DHS - Expense Ratio Comparison
DDWM has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than DHS's 0.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
DDWM vs. DHS - Dividend Comparison
DDWM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.52%, less than DHS's 3.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DDWM WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International Equity Fund | 2.52% | 2.47% | 3.57% | 4.46% | 4.28% | 3.73% | 3.52% | 3.63% | 4.40% | 2.65% | 4.00% | 0.00% |
DHS WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund | 3.19% | 3.32% | 3.66% | 4.31% | 3.42% | 3.29% | 4.14% | 3.69% | 3.76% | 3.00% | 3.25% | 3.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DDWM and DHS have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DHS has higher volatility (3.88%) compared to DDWM (3.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DDWM dropped -35.00% vs DHS's -67.25%.
On 10-year performance, DDWM leads with 10.64% vs 9.68% for DHS. On fees, DHS is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, DDWM has been the lower-risk option at 3.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, DDWM has performed better with a 10.64% return vs 9.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DHS is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for DDWM.
DHS has the higher dividend yield at 3.19%, compared with 2.52% for DDWM.
DDWM is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while DHS is Large Cap Value Equities. DDWM tracks WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International Equity Index, while DHS tracks WisdomTree U.S. High Dividend Index. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for DDWM and 0.38% for DHS.
DHS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DDWM and DHS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer