PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DDWM vs. DHS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DDWM vs. DHS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International Equity Fund (DDWM) and WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund (DHS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DDWM achieves a 9.49% return, which is significantly lower than DHS's 16.66% return. Over the past 10 years, DDWM has outperformed DHS with an annualized return of 10.64%, while DHS has yielded a comparatively lower 9.68% annualized return.


DDWM

1D
-0.41%
1M
0.71%
6M
5.28%
YTD
9.49%
1Y
21.99%
3Y*
17.74%
5Y*
13.00%
10Y*
10.64%
ALL TIME*
10.83%

DHS

1D
-0.37%
1M
1.58%
6M
9.76%
YTD
16.66%
1Y
25.21%
3Y*
16.49%
5Y*
12.26%
10Y*
9.68%
ALL TIME*
8.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$5.12M$4.14M$4.85M
$5.32M$3.61M$2.98M

DDWM vs. DHS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DDWM
WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International Equity Fund
9.49%30.07%10.70%15.25%-0.77%14.84%-4.56%21.43%-11.75%18.80%
DHS
WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund
16.66%12.87%18.02%-0.19%7.97%23.20%-5.70%22.59%-7.41%11.69%

Correlation

The correlation between DDWM and DHS is 0.44, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.62

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2016

0.65

Over the past year, the correlation between DDWM and DHS has dropped to 0.44 - well below their long-term average of 0.65, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

DDWM vs. DHS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DDWM
DHS

Industrials

19.3%
4.5%

Financial Services

18.2%
23.2%

Consumer Cyclical

9.3%
5.4%

Healthcare

8.2%
15.9%

Technology

7.4%
7.4%

Consumer Defensive

7.0%
14.2%

Basic Materials

5.8%
1.1%

Utilities

5.2%
8.9%

Communication Services

4.7%
8.2%

Energy

3.7%
8.2%

Real Estate

2.7%
3.0%

Industrials

DDWM
19.3%
DHS
4.5%

Financial Services

DDWM
18.2%
DHS
23.2%

Consumer Cyclical

DDWM
9.3%
DHS
5.4%

Healthcare

DDWM
8.2%
DHS
15.9%

Technology

DDWM
7.4%
DHS
7.4%

Consumer Defensive

DDWM
7.0%
DHS
14.2%

Basic Materials

DDWM
5.8%
DHS
1.1%

Utilities

DDWM
5.2%
DHS
8.9%

Communication Services

DDWM
4.7%
DHS
8.2%

Energy

DDWM
3.7%
DHS
8.2%

Real Estate

DDWM
2.7%
DHS
3.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DDWM vs. DHS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DDWM
DDWM Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
DDWM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DDWM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
DDWM Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
DDWM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
DDWM Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

DHS
DHS Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
DHS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DHS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
DHS Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
DHS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
DHS Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DDWM vs. DHS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International Equity Fund (DDWM) and WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund (DHS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DDWMDHSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.42

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.04

3.97

-1.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.35

14.58

-7.23

DDWM vs. DHS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DDWM Sharpe Ratio is 1.68, which is lower than the DHS Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DDWM and DHS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DDWM vs. DHS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DDWM drawdown since its inception was -35.00%, smaller than the maximum DHS drawdown of -67.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDWM and DHS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DDWMDHSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.00%

-67.25%

+32.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.56%

-6.30%

-4.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.34%

-11.87%

-0.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.79%

-15.28%

+0.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.00%

-37.35%

+2.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.41%

-2.23%

+1.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.01%

-9.48%

+5.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.93%

1.71%

+1.22%

Volatility

DDWM vs. DHS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International Equity Fund (DDWM) is 3.29%, while WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund (DHS) has a volatility of 3.88%. This indicates that DDWM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DHS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DDWMDHSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.29%

3.88%

-0.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.05%

7.92%

+3.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.87%

10.43%

+2.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.37%

13.91%

-0.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.07%

16.09%

-1.02%

DDWM vs. DHS - Expense Ratio Comparison

DDWM has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than DHS's 0.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

DDWM vs. DHS - Dividend Comparison

DDWM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.52%, less than DHS's 3.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DDWM
WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International Equity Fund
2.52%2.47%3.57%4.46%4.28%3.73%3.52%3.63%4.40%2.65%4.00%0.00%
DHS
WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund
3.19%3.32%3.66%4.31%3.42%3.29%4.14%3.69%3.76%3.00%3.25%3.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


DDWM and DHS have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DHS has higher volatility (3.88%) compared to DDWM (3.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DDWM dropped -35.00% vs DHS's -67.25%.

On 10-year performance, DDWM leads with 10.64% vs 9.68% for DHS. On fees, DHS is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, DDWM has been the lower-risk option at 3.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DDWM has performed better with a 10.64% return vs 9.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DHS is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for DDWM.

DHS has the higher dividend yield at 3.19%, compared with 2.52% for DDWM.

DDWM is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while DHS is Large Cap Value Equities. DDWM tracks WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International Equity Index, while DHS tracks WisdomTree U.S. High Dividend Index. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for DDWM and 0.38% for DHS.

DHS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DDWM and DHS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer