PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DDWM vs. BKIE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DDWM vs. BKIE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International Equity Fund (DDWM) and BNY Mellon International Equity ETF (BKIE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DDWM achieves a 6.51% return, which is significantly lower than BKIE's 8.46% return.


DDWM

1D
-0.60%
1M
3.18%
YTD
6.51%
6M
8.98%
1Y
20.03%
3Y*
17.86%
5Y*
12.22%
10Y*
10.36%

BKIE

1D
-0.89%
1M
3.12%
YTD
8.46%
6M
11.11%
1Y
22.58%
3Y*
17.39%
5Y*
9.05%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DDWM vs. BKIE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
DDWM
WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International Equity Fund
6.51%30.07%10.70%15.25%-0.77%14.84%21.97%
BKIE
BNY Mellon International Equity ETF
8.46%32.08%4.63%18.25%-13.60%13.75%34.17%

Correlation

The correlation between DDWM and BKIE is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2020

0.93

The correlation between DDWM and BKIE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

DDWM vs. BKIE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DDWM
BKIE

Industrials

21.1%
18.6%

Financial Services

20.6%
25.8%

Consumer Cyclical

10.3%
7.3%

Healthcare

8.8%
9.1%

Technology

8.1%
10.1%

Consumer Defensive

7.5%
6.2%

Communication Services

5.5%
4.2%

Utilities

5.5%
3.7%

Basic Materials

5.4%
7.2%

Energy

4.1%
5.9%

Real Estate

3.1%
2.0%

Industrials

DDWM
21.1%
BKIE
18.6%

Financial Services

DDWM
20.6%
BKIE
25.8%

Consumer Cyclical

DDWM
10.3%
BKIE
7.3%

Healthcare

DDWM
8.8%
BKIE
9.1%

Technology

DDWM
8.1%
BKIE
10.1%

Consumer Defensive

DDWM
7.5%
BKIE
6.2%

Communication Services

DDWM
5.5%
BKIE
4.2%

Utilities

DDWM
5.5%
BKIE
3.7%

Basic Materials

DDWM
5.4%
BKIE
7.2%

Energy

DDWM
4.1%
BKIE
5.9%

Real Estate

DDWM
3.1%
BKIE
2.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DDWM vs. BKIE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DDWM
DDWM Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
DDWM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DDWM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
DDWM Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
DDWM Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
DDWM Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

BKIE
BKIE Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
BKIE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKIE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKIE Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
BKIE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKIE Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DDWM vs. BKIE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International Equity Fund (DDWM) and BNY Mellon International Equity ETF (BKIE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DDWMBKIEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

0.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.28

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.91

1.99

-0.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.99

7.68

-0.69

DDWM vs. BKIE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DDWM Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is comparable to the BKIE Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DDWM and BKIE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DDWMBKIEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.60

1.56

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

0.56

+0.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.70

0.92

-0.22

Drawdowns

DDWM vs. BKIE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DDWM drawdown since its inception was -35.00%, which is greater than BKIE's maximum drawdown of -28.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDWM and BKIE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DDWMBKIEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.00%

-28.19%

-6.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.56%

-11.41%

+0.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.34%

-13.19%

+0.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.79%

-28.19%

+13.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.82%

-1.33%

-1.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.05%

-4.98%

+0.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.87%

2.95%

-0.08%

Volatility

DDWM vs. BKIE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International Equity Fund (DDWM) is 3.80%, while BNY Mellon International Equity ETF (BKIE) has a volatility of 4.42%. This indicates that DDWM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BKIE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DDWMBKIEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.80%

4.42%

-0.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.44%

12.17%

-1.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.60%

14.58%

-1.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.33%

16.12%

-2.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.31%

16.34%

-1.03%

DDWM vs. BKIE - Expense Ratio Comparison

DDWM has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than BKIE's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

DDWM vs. BKIE - Dividend Comparison

DDWM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.33%, less than BKIE's 3.26% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BKIE
BNY Mellon International Equity ETF
3.26%3.12%3.31%2.88%2.97%2.58%1.49%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DDWM
WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International Equity Fund
2.33%2.47%3.57%4.46%4.28%3.73%3.52%3.63%4.40%2.65%4.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DDWM and BKIE have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BKIE has higher volatility (4.42%) compared to DDWM (3.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DDWM dropped -35.00% vs BKIE's -28.19%.

On 5-year performance, DDWM leads with 12.22% vs 9.05% for BKIE. On fees, BKIE is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, DDWM has been the lower-risk option at 3.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DDWM has performed better with a 12.22% return vs 9.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BKIE is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for DDWM.

BKIE has the higher dividend yield at 3.26%, compared with 2.33% for DDWM.

DDWM tracks WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International Equity Index, while BKIE tracks Morningstar Developed Markets ex-US Large Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and BNY Mellon. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for DDWM and 0.04% for BKIE.

DDWM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.60 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DDWM and BKIE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer