DDVCX vs. FBLEX
Compare and contrast key facts about Nomura Value Fund Class C (DDVCX) and Fidelity Series Stock Selector Large Cap Value Fund (FBLEX).
DDVCX is an actively managed fund by Nomura. It was launched on Apr 30, 2002. FBLEX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Dec 6, 2012.
Performance
DDVCX vs. FBLEX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DDVCX vs. FBLEX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DDVCX Nomura Value Fund Class C | 0.79% | 9.95% | 5.68% | 1.06% | -4.57% | 20.87% | -0.63% | 19.33% | -3.92% | 12.51% |
FBLEX Fidelity Series Stock Selector Large Cap Value Fund | -2.01% | 17.06% | 18.04% | 15.60% | -4.82% | 26.83% | 4.34% | 25.57% | -9.04% | 12.38% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DDVCX achieves a 0.79% return, which is significantly higher than FBLEX's -2.01% return. Over the past 10 years, DDVCX has underperformed FBLEX with an annualized return of 6.92%, while FBLEX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.11% annualized return.
DDVCX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -7.81%
- YTD
- 0.79%
- 6M
- 3.79%
- 1Y
- 11.08%
- 3Y*
- 7.27%
- 5Y*
- 4.65%
- 10Y*
- 6.92%
FBLEX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -6.70%
- YTD
- -2.01%
- 6M
- 2.97%
- 1Y
- 12.73%
- 3Y*
- 15.51%
- 5Y*
- 11.00%
- 10Y*
- 11.11%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DDVCX vs. FBLEX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DDVCX has a 1.72% expense ratio, which is higher than FBLEX's 0.01% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
DDVCX vs. FBLEX — Risk / Return Rank
DDVCX
FBLEX
DDVCX vs. FBLEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nomura Value Fund Class C (DDVCX) and Fidelity Series Stock Selector Large Cap Value Fund (FBLEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DDVCX | FBLEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.75 | 0.91 | -0.16 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.13 | 1.32 | -0.19 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.20 | -0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.86 | 1.06 | -0.20 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.35 | 4.92 | -1.57 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DDVCX | FBLEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 | 0.91 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 | 0.75 | -0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 | 0.64 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | 0.69 | -0.32 |
Correlation
The correlation between DDVCX and FBLEX is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
DDVCX vs. FBLEX - Dividend Comparison
DDVCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 26.23%, more than FBLEX's 11.33% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DDVCX Nomura Value Fund Class C | 26.23% | 26.55% | 30.88% | 10.78% | 9.46% | 23.96% | 1.92% | 4.13% | 5.29% | 3.08% | 1.57% | 1.97% |
FBLEX Fidelity Series Stock Selector Large Cap Value Fund | 11.33% | 9.95% | 12.63% | 5.05% | 12.66% | 14.51% | 3.85% | 5.65% | 10.97% | 7.09% | 2.47% | 13.81% |
Drawdowns
DDVCX vs. FBLEX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DDVCX drawdown since its inception was -54.29%, which is greater than FBLEX's maximum drawdown of -39.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDVCX and FBLEX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DDVCX | FBLEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.29% | -39.73% | -14.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.60% | -11.55% | -0.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.71% | -19.00% | +0.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.60% | -39.73% | +2.13% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.59% | -6.89% | -1.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.07% | -3.86% | -5.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.11% | 2.49% | +0.62% |
Volatility
DDVCX vs. FBLEX - Volatility Comparison
Nomura Value Fund Class C (DDVCX) has a higher volatility of 3.92% compared to Fidelity Series Stock Selector Large Cap Value Fund (FBLEX) at 3.48%. This indicates that DDVCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBLEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DDVCX | FBLEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.92% | 3.48% | +0.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.77% | 7.78% | +0.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.13% | 15.13% | +1.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.49% | 14.78% | -0.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.04% | 17.39% | -0.35% |