DDVCX vs. PSECX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

DDVCX (Nomura Value Fund Class C) and PSECX (1789 Growth and Income Fund) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, DDVCX returned 6.75%/yr vs 7.33%/yr for PSECX. Their correlation of 0.85 means they have usually moved in the same direction. DDVCX charges 1.72%/yr vs 2.02%/yr for PSECX.

Performance

DDVCX vs. PSECX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nomura Value Fund Class C (DDVCX) and 1789 Growth and Income Fund (PSECX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DDVCX achieves a 8.20% return, which is significantly higher than PSECX's 6.35% return. Over the past 10 years, DDVCX has underperformed PSECX with an annualized return of 6.75%, while PSECX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.33% annualized return.

DDVCX

• 1D: 0.31%
• 1M: 0.78%
• 6M: 2.83%
• YTD: 8.20%
• 1Y: 16.39%
• 3Y*: 7.98%
• 5Y*: 5.36%
• 10Y*: 6.75%
• ALL TIME*: 6.75%

PSECX

• 1D: 0.40%
• 1M: 2.34%
• 6M: 2.98%
• YTD: 6.35%
• 1Y: 10.20%
• 3Y*: 11.09%
• 5Y*: 7.37%
• 10Y*: 7.33%
• ALL TIME*: 7.21%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
DDVCX Nomura Value Fund Class C	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
PSECX 1789 Growth and Income Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

DDVCX vs. PSECX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DDVCX Nomura Value Fund Class C	8.20%	9.95%	5.68%	1.06%	-4.57%	20.87%	-0.63%	19.33%	-3.92%	12.51%
PSECX 1789 Growth and Income Fund	6.35%	8.04%	14.49%	10.64%	-10.66%	25.43%	0.78%	23.99%	-5.18%	5.16%

Correlation

The correlation between DDVCX and PSECX is 0.79, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.79
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.81
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.84
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.83
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 28, 2013	0.85

The correlation between DDVCX and PSECX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

DDVCX vs. PSECX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DDVCX

DDVCX Risk / Return Rank: 34
DDVCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
DDVCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
DDVCX Omega Ratio Rank: 34
DDVCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
DDVCX Martin Ratio Rank: 28

PSECX

PSECX Risk / Return Rank: 25
PSECX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
PSECX Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
PSECX Omega Ratio Rank: 23
PSECX Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
PSECX Martin Ratio Rank: 27

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DDVCX vs. PSECX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nomura Value Fund Class C (DDVCX) and 1789 Growth and Income Fund (PSECX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DDVCX	PSECX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.13	0.86	+0.26
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.69	1.32	+0.37
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.15	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.57	1.18	+0.39
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.24	3.94	+0.31

DDVCX vs. PSECX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DDVCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.13, which is higher than the PSECX Sharpe Ratio of 0.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DDVCX and PSECX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DDVCX vs. PSECX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DDVCX drawdown since its inception was -54.29%, which is greater than PSECX's maximum drawdown of -31.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDVCX and PSECX.

Drawdown Indicators

	DDVCX	PSECX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-54.29%	-31.13%	-23.16%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.59%	-7.44%	-1.15%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.71%	-12.51%	-6.20%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.71%	-18.47%	-0.24%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-37.60%	-31.13%	-6.47%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.87%	-0.74%	-1.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.00%	-3.86%	-5.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.19%	2.22%	+0.97%

Volatility

DDVCX vs. PSECX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nomura Value Fund Class C (DDVCX) is 2.90%, while 1789 Growth and Income Fund (PSECX) has a volatility of 3.14%. This indicates that DDVCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PSECX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DDVCX	PSECX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.90%	3.14%	-0.24%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.92%	7.69%	+1.23%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.96%	10.18%	+1.78%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.50%	11.98%	+2.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.04%	13.18%	+3.86%

DDVCX vs. PSECX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DDVCX has a 1.72% expense ratio, which is lower than PSECX's 2.02% expense ratio.

Dividends

DDVCX vs. PSECX - Dividend Comparison

DDVCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 24.25%, more than PSECX's 0.93% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DDVCX Nomura Value Fund Class C	24.25%	26.55%	30.88%	10.78%	9.46%	23.96%	1.92%	4.13%	5.29%	3.08%	1.57%	1.97%
PSECX 1789 Growth and Income Fund	0.93%	0.85%	3.88%	2.71%	4.60%	1.53%	0.27%	1.16%	6.78%	0.59%	0.31%	5.12%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DDVCX and PSECX in my portfolio?

DDVCX and PSECX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DDVCX or PSECX?

PSECX has higher volatility (3.14%) compared to DDVCX (2.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DDVCX dropped -54.29% vs PSECX's -31.13%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DDVCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.13 vs 0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.