PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DDVCX vs. PSECX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DDVCX vs. PSECX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nomura Value Fund Class C (DDVCX) and 1789 Growth and Income Fund (PSECX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DDVCX achieves a 6.18% return, which is significantly higher than PSECX's 2.59% return. Over the past 10 years, DDVCX has underperformed PSECX with an annualized return of 6.81%, while PSECX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.16% annualized return.


DDVCX

1D
0.48%
1M
0.64%
YTD
6.18%
6M
5.73%
1Y
17.60%
3Y*
8.43%
5Y*
5.58%
10Y*
6.81%

PSECX

1D
-0.51%
1M
-1.22%
YTD
2.59%
6M
2.13%
1Y
8.51%
3Y*
11.30%
5Y*
7.41%
10Y*
7.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DDVCX vs. PSECX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DDVCX
Nomura Value Fund Class C
6.18%9.95%5.68%1.06%-4.57%20.87%-0.63%19.33%-3.92%12.51%
PSECX
1789 Growth and Income Fund
2.59%8.04%14.49%10.64%-10.66%25.43%0.78%23.99%-5.18%5.16%

Correlation

The correlation between DDVCX and PSECX is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 28, 2013

0.85

The correlation between DDVCX and PSECX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DDVCX vs. PSECX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DDVCX
DDVCX Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
DDVCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DDVCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
DDVCX Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
DDVCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
DDVCX Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

PSECX
PSECX Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
PSECX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSECX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSECX Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
PSECX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSECX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DDVCX vs. PSECX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nomura Value Fund Class C (DDVCX) and 1789 Growth and Income Fund (PSECX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DDVCXPSECXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.16

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.07

1.28

+0.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.83

4.49

+1.34

DDVCX vs. PSECX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DDVCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is higher than the PSECX Sharpe Ratio of 0.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DDVCX and PSECX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DDVCX vs. PSECX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DDVCX drawdown since its inception was -54.29%, which is greater than PSECX's maximum drawdown of -31.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDVCX and PSECX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DDVCXPSECXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.29%

-31.13%

-23.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.59%

-7.44%

-1.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.71%

-12.51%

-6.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.71%

-18.47%

-0.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.60%

-31.13%

-6.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.70%

-3.09%

-0.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.03%

-3.87%

-5.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.03%

2.11%

+0.92%

Volatility

DDVCX vs. PSECX - Volatility Comparison

Nomura Value Fund Class C (DDVCX) has a higher volatility of 3.61% compared to 1789 Growth and Income Fund (PSECX) at 3.06%. This indicates that DDVCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PSECX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DDVCXPSECXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.61%

3.06%

+0.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.25%

7.72%

+1.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.15%

10.10%

+2.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.58%

11.98%

+2.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.09%

13.21%

+3.88%

DDVCX vs. PSECX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DDVCX has a 1.72% expense ratio, which is lower than PSECX's 2.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

DDVCX vs. PSECX - Dividend Comparison

DDVCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 24.81%, more than PSECX's 0.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DDVCX
Nomura Value Fund Class C
24.81%26.55%30.88%10.78%9.46%23.96%1.92%4.13%5.29%3.08%1.57%1.97%
PSECX
1789 Growth and Income Fund
0.98%0.85%3.88%2.71%4.60%1.53%0.27%1.16%6.78%0.59%0.31%5.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


DDVCX and PSECX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DDVCX has higher volatility (3.61%) compared to PSECX (3.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DDVCX dropped -54.29% vs PSECX's -31.13%.

DDVCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.46 vs 0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DDVCX and PSECX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer