DDTO vs. JULB
DDTO (Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - October) and JULB (Aptus July Buffer ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DDTO charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for JULB.
Performance
DDTO vs. JULB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DDTO achieves a 6.64% return, which is significantly lower than JULB's 8.30% return.
DDTO
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- 1.42%
- 6M
- 5.61%
- YTD
- 6.64%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JULB
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- 2.01%
- 6M
- 7.34%
- YTD
- 8.30%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DDTO vs. JULB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DDTO Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - October | 6.64% | 2.43% |
JULB Aptus July Buffer ETF | 8.30% | 2.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between DDTO and JULB is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2025 | 0.95 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DDTO vs. JULB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - October (DDTO) and Aptus July Buffer ETF (JULB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DDTO vs. JULB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DDTO drawdown since its inception was -4.98%, roughly equal to the maximum JULB drawdown of -5.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDTO and JULB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DDTO | JULB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.98% | -5.24% | +0.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.63% | -0.79% | +0.16% |
Volatility
DDTO vs. JULB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DDTO | JULB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.11% | 6.74% | +0.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.11% | 6.74% | +0.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.11% | 6.74% | +0.37% |
DDTO vs. JULB - Expense Ratio Comparison
DDTO has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than JULB's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
DDTO vs. JULB - Dividend Comparison
Neither DDTO nor JULB has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, DDTO and JULB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, JULB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JULB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for DDTO.
DDTO and JULB have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Aptus Capital Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for DDTO and 0.25% for JULB.
Find the right allocation for DDTO and JULB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer