PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DDTO vs. JULB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DDTO vs. JULB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - October (DDTO) and Aptus July Buffer ETF (JULB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DDTO achieves a 6.80% return, which is significantly lower than JULB's 8.08% return.


DDTO

1D
0.26%
1M
0.92%
6M
5.98%
YTD
6.80%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

JULB

1D
0.54%
1M
0.57%
6M
7.15%
YTD
8.08%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$79.99K$109.02K$145.87K
$122.17K$181.25K$221.75K

DDTO vs. JULB - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DDTO and JULB is 0.95, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2025

0.95

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DDTO vs. JULB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - October (DDTO) and Aptus July Buffer ETF (JULB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

DDTO vs. JULB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DDTO vs. JULB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DDTO drawdown since its inception was -4.98%, roughly equal to the maximum JULB drawdown of -5.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDTO and JULB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DDTOJULBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.98%

-5.24%

+0.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.20%

+0.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.61%

-0.78%

+0.17%

Volatility

DDTO vs. JULB - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DDTOJULBDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.11%

6.81%

+0.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.11%

6.81%

+0.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.11%

6.81%

+0.30%

DDTO vs. JULB - Expense Ratio Comparison

DDTO has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than JULB's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

DDTO vs. JULB - Dividend Comparison

Neither DDTO nor JULB has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, DDTO and JULB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, JULB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

JULB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for DDTO.

DDTO and JULB have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Aptus. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for DDTO and 0.25% for JULB.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DDTO and JULB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer