DDTO vs. FFTY
DDTO (Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - October) and FFTY (Innovator IBD 50 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DDTO is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Innovator, while FFTY is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the IBD 50 Index. DDTO is actively managed, while FFTY is passively managed. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DDTO charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for FFTY.
Performance
DDTO vs. FFTY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DDTO achieves a 4.95% return, which is significantly lower than FFTY's 12.41% return.
DDTO
- 1D
- -0.81%
- 1M
- 0.48%
- YTD
- 4.95%
- 6M
- 5.32%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FFTY
- 1D
- -7.47%
- 1M
- -5.12%
- YTD
- 12.41%
- 6M
- 12.46%
- 1Y
- 30.31%
- 3Y*
- 18.01%
- 5Y*
- -1.91%
- 10Y*
- 6.73%
DDTO vs. FFTY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DDTO Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - October | 4.95% | 1.87% |
FFTY Innovator IBD 50 ETF | 12.41% | -5.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between DDTO and FFTY is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2025 | 0.66 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DDTO vs. FFTY — Risk / Return Rank
DDTO
FFTY
DDTO vs. FFTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - October (DDTO) and Innovator IBD 50 ETF (FFTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DDTO | FFTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.87 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.07 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.25 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.42 | 0.17 | +1.25 |
Drawdowns
DDTO vs. FFTY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DDTO drawdown since its inception was -4.98%, smaller than the maximum FFTY drawdown of -59.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDTO and FFTY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DDTO | FFTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.98% | -59.46% | +54.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -23.29% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -29.60% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -59.46% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -59.46% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.83% | -20.77% | +19.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.67% | -22.37% | +21.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 8.78% | — |
Volatility
DDTO vs. FFTY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DDTO | FFTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 11.61% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 27.32% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.33% | 34.94% | -27.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.33% | 29.32% | -21.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.33% | 27.51% | -20.18% |
DDTO vs. FFTY - Expense Ratio Comparison
DDTO has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than FFTY's 0.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
DDTO vs. FFTY - Dividend Comparison
DDTO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FFTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.20%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DDTO Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - October | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FFTY Innovator IBD 50 ETF | 1.20% | 1.35% | 0.91% | 0.65% | 2.75% | 0.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DDTO and FFTY have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DDTO is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DDTO is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FFTY.
FFTY has the higher dividend yield at 1.20%, compared with 0.00% for DDTO.
DDTO is categorized as Defined Outcome, while FFTY is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for DDTO and 0.80% for FFTY.
Find the right allocation for DDTO and FFTY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer