DDTM vs. APRB
DDTM (Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - March) and APRB (Aptus April Buffer ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. DDTM is passively managed, while APRB is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DDTM charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for APRB.
Performance
DDTM vs. APRB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
DDTM
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- 2.04%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
APRB
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 1.69%
- YTD
- 4.77%
- 6M
- 5.32%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DDTM vs. APRB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
DDTM Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - March | 4.73% |
APRB Aptus April Buffer ETF | 3.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between DDTM and APRB is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2026 | 0.94 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DDTM vs. APRB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - March (DDTM) and Aptus April Buffer ETF (APRB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DDTM | APRB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.36 | 2.00 | +0.35 |
Drawdowns
DDTM vs. APRB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DDTM drawdown since its inception was -4.73%, roughly equal to the maximum APRB drawdown of -4.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDTM and APRB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DDTM | APRB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.73% | -4.59% | -0.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.15% | -0.11% | -0.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.84% | -0.74% | -0.10% |
Volatility
DDTM vs. APRB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DDTM | APRB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.40% | 5.98% | +2.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.40% | 5.98% | +2.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.40% | 5.98% | +2.42% |
DDTM vs. APRB - Expense Ratio Comparison
DDTM has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than APRB's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
DDTM vs. APRB - Dividend Comparison
Neither DDTM nor APRB has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, DDTM and APRB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, APRB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
APRB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for DDTM.
DDTM and APRB have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Aptus Capital Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for DDTM and 0.25% for APRB.
Find the right allocation for DDTM and APRB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer