DDTJ vs. JULB

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

DDTJ (Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - January) and JULB (Aptus July Buffer ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. DDTJ charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for JULB.

Performance

DDTJ vs. JULB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - January (DDTJ) and Aptus July Buffer ETF (JULB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

DDTJ

• 1D: -0.97%
• 1M: 0.50%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

JULB

• 1D: -0.77%
• 1M: 0.87%
• YTD: 5.70%
• 6M: 6.10%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DDTJ vs. JULB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
DDTJ Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - January	4.65%
JULB Aptus July Buffer ETF	5.63%

Correlation

The correlation between DDTJ and JULB is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2026	0.95

Return for Risk

DDTJ vs. JULB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - January (DDTJ) and Aptus July Buffer ETF (JULB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DDTJ	JULB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.44	1.97	-0.53

Drawdowns

DDTJ vs. JULB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DDTJ drawdown since its inception was -5.15%, roughly equal to the maximum JULB drawdown of -5.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDTJ and JULB.

Drawdown Indicators

	DDTJ	JULB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-5.15%	-5.24%	+0.09%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.97%	-0.77%	-0.20%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.83%	-0.87%	+0.04%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	DDTJ	JULB	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.99%	6.85%	+1.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.99%	6.85%	+1.14%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.99%	6.85%	+1.14%

DDTJ vs. JULB - Expense Ratio Comparison

DDTJ has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than JULB's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

DDTJ vs. JULB - Dividend Comparison

Neither DDTJ nor JULB has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DDTJ and JULB in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.95, DDTJ and JULB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, DDTJ or JULB?

On fees, JULB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, DDTJ or JULB?

JULB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for DDTJ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DDTJ or JULB?

DDTJ and JULB have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between DDTJ and JULB?

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Aptus Capital Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for DDTJ and 0.25% for JULB.