PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DDTF vs. UXJL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DDTF vs. UXJL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - February (DDTF) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July (UXJL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


DDTF

1D
-0.05%
1M
2.28%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

UXJL

1D
-0.76%
1M
6.02%
YTD
11.78%
6M
11.50%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DDTF vs. UXJL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DDTF and UXJL is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2026

0.95

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DDTF vs. UXJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - February (DDTF) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July (UXJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

DDTF vs. UXJL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DDTFUXJLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.61

1.87

-0.26

Drawdowns

DDTF vs. UXJL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DDTF drawdown since its inception was -5.42%, smaller than the maximum UXJL drawdown of -10.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDTF and UXJL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DDTFUXJLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.42%

-10.29%

+4.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.16%

-0.76%

+0.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.04%

-1.51%

+0.47%

Volatility

DDTF vs. UXJL - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DDTFUXJLDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.72%

13.90%

-5.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.72%

13.90%

-5.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.72%

13.90%

-5.18%

DDTF vs. UXJL - Expense Ratio Comparison

DDTF has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than UXJL's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

DDTF vs. UXJL - Dividend Comparison

Neither DDTF nor UXJL has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, DDTF and UXJL move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, DDTF is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DDTF is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for UXJL.

DDTF and UXJL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for DDTF and 0.85% for UXJL.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DDTF and UXJL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer