DDNQ vs. QB
DDNQ (Innovator Growth-100 Dual Directional 5 Buffer ETF - Quarterly) and QB (ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. DDNQ is actively managed, while QB is passively managed. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DDNQ charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for QB.
Performance
DDNQ vs. QB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
DDNQ
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.76%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QB
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 2.03%
- YTD
- 10.26%
- 6M
- 9.81%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DDNQ vs. QB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
DDNQ Innovator Growth-100 Dual Directional 5 Buffer ETF - Quarterly | 5.06% |
QB ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF | 10.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between DDNQ and QB is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2026 | 0.71 |
DDNQ vs. QB - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DDNQ
QB
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Industrials
Utilities
Basic Materials
Energy
Financial Services
Real Estate
Technology
DDNQ
QB
Communication Services
DDNQ
QB
Consumer Cyclical
DDNQ
QB
Consumer Defensive
DDNQ
QB
Healthcare
DDNQ
QB
Industrials
DDNQ
QB
Utilities
DDNQ
QB
Basic Materials
DDNQ
QB
Energy
DDNQ
QB
Financial Services
DDNQ
QB
Real Estate
DDNQ
QB
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DDNQ vs. QB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Growth-100 Dual Directional 5 Buffer ETF - Quarterly (DDNQ) and ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (QB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DDNQ | QB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.24 | 3.12 | -1.87 |
Drawdowns
DDNQ vs. QB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DDNQ drawdown since its inception was -5.65%, which is greater than QB's maximum drawdown of -1.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDNQ and QB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DDNQ | QB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.65% | -1.83% | -3.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.49% | +0.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.73% | -0.35% | -0.38% |
Volatility
DDNQ vs. QB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DDNQ | QB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.17% | 5.74% | +4.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.17% | 5.74% | +4.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.17% | 5.74% | +4.43% |
DDNQ vs. QB - Expense Ratio Comparison
DDNQ has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than QB's 0.58% expense ratio.
Dividends
DDNQ vs. QB - Dividend Comparison
DDNQ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
DDNQ Innovator Growth-100 Dual Directional 5 Buffer ETF - Quarterly | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QB ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF | 0.62% | 0.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DDNQ and QB have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QB is cheaper at 0.58% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QB is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for DDNQ.
QB has the higher dividend yield at 0.62%, compared with 0.00% for DDNQ.
They also come from different issuers: Innovator and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for DDNQ and 0.58% for QB.
Find the right allocation for DDNQ and QB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer