DDM vs. QTJL

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

DDM (ProShares Ultra Dow30) and QTJL (Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July) are both Leveraged Equities funds. DDM is passively managed, while QTJL is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, DDM returned 13.17%/yr vs 9.67%/yr for QTJL. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DDM charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for QTJL.

Performance

DDM vs. QTJL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Dow30 (DDM) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DDM achieves a 16.59% return, which is significantly higher than QTJL's 4.97% return.

DDM

• 1D: -0.51%
• 1M: 4.90%
• 6M: 9.74%
• YTD: 16.59%
• 1Y: 34.52%
• 3Y*: 26.04%
• 5Y*: 13.17%
• 10Y*: 19.35%

QTJL

• 1D: -1.54%
• 1M: -1.99%
• 6M: 3.87%
• YTD: 4.97%
• 1Y: 14.88%
• 3Y*: 17.19%
• 5Y*: 9.67%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DDM vs. QTJL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
DDM ProShares Ultra Dow30	16.59%	20.59%	21.60%	24.34%	-19.48%	11.18%
QTJL Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July	4.97%	21.07%	16.50%	42.39%	-30.16%	9.36%

Correlation

The correlation between DDM and QTJL is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.62
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.63
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.70
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2021	0.70

The correlation between DDM and QTJL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

DDM vs. QTJL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DDM	QTJL
Financial Services	32.1%	0.2%
Industrials	12.1%	2.6%
Technology	11.2%	58.0%
Healthcare	9.2%	3.7%
Consumer Cyclical	7.1%	11.6%
Communication Services	3.5%	14.5%
Basic Materials	2.7%	1.0%
Consumer Defensive	2.7%	6.6%
Energy	1.3%	0.5%
Real Estate	-	0.1%
Utilities	-	1.2%

Return for Risk

DDM vs. QTJL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DDM

DDM Risk / Return Rank: 49
DDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
DDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
DDM Omega Ratio Rank: 48
DDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
DDM Martin Ratio Rank: 50

QTJL

QTJL Risk / Return Rank: 59
QTJL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
QTJL Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
QTJL Omega Ratio Rank: 60
QTJL Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
QTJL Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DDM vs. QTJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Dow30 (DDM) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DDM	QTJL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.41	1.43	-0.02
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.04	2.03	+0.01
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.29	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.80	2.24	-0.44
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.60	11.30	-4.71

DDM vs. QTJL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DDM Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is comparable to the QTJL Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DDM and QTJL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DDM vs. QTJL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DDM drawdown since its inception was -81.70%, which is greater than QTJL's maximum drawdown of -33.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDM and QTJL.

Drawdown Indicators

	DDM	QTJL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-81.70%	-33.40%	-48.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.31%	-6.68%	-12.63%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-31.62%	-22.43%	-9.19%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-40.18%	-33.40%	-6.78%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-63.13%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.12%	-2.39%	+0.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.25%	-7.78%	-9.47%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.25%	1.32%	+3.93%

Volatility

DDM vs. QTJL - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Ultra Dow30 (DDM) has a higher volatility of 6.08% compared to Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL) at 3.81%. This indicates that DDM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QTJL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DDM	QTJL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.08%	3.81%	+2.27%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.43%	8.24%	+11.19%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.67%	10.50%	+14.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.61%	20.33%	+9.28%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	34.71%	20.27%	+14.44%

DDM vs. QTJL - Expense Ratio Comparison

DDM has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than QTJL's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

DDM vs. QTJL - Dividend Comparison

DDM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, while QTJL has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DDM ProShares Ultra Dow30	0.93%	0.94%	1.00%	0.27%	0.83%	0.18%	0.31%	0.62%	0.89%	0.68%	1.08%	1.23%
QTJL Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DDM and QTJL in my portfolio?

DDM and QTJL have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DDM or QTJL?

DDM has higher volatility (6.08%) compared to QTJL (3.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DDM dropped -81.70% vs QTJL's -33.40%.

Which ETF is better, DDM or QTJL?

On 5-year performance, DDM leads with 13.17% vs 9.67% for QTJL. On fees, QTJL is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, QTJL has been the lower-risk option at 3.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DDM or QTJL?

Over the 5-year period, DDM has performed better with a 13.17% return vs 9.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DDM or QTJL?

QTJL is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for DDM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DDM or QTJL?

DDM has the higher dividend yield at 0.93%, compared with 0.00% for QTJL.

What is the main difference between DDM and QTJL?

They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for DDM and 0.79% for QTJL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QTJL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.