DDM vs. QTAP
DDM (ProShares Ultra Dow30) and QTAP (Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April) are both Leveraged Equities funds. DDM is passively managed, while QTAP is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, DDM returned 12.69%/yr vs 14.09%/yr for QTAP. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DDM charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for QTAP.
Performance
DDM vs. QTAP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DDM achieves a 11.91% return, which is significantly lower than QTAP's 14.78% return.
DDM
- 1D
- 0.92%
- 1M
- 7.36%
- YTD
- 11.91%
- 6M
- 14.33%
- 1Y
- 41.13%
- 3Y*
- 25.91%
- 5Y*
- 12.69%
- 10Y*
- 19.78%
QTAP
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 2.81%
- YTD
- 14.78%
- 6M
- 15.73%
- 1Y
- 26.07%
- 3Y*
- 21.22%
- 5Y*
- 14.09%
- 10Y*
- —
DDM vs. QTAP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DDM ProShares Ultra Dow30 | 11.91% | 20.59% | 21.60% | 24.34% | -19.48% | 20.62% |
QTAP Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April | 14.78% | 19.36% | 17.34% | 43.32% | -25.87% | 15.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between DDM and QTAP is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2021 | 0.68 |
The correlation between DDM and QTAP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.
DDM vs. QTAP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DDM
QTAP
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Energy
Communication Services
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
DDM
QTAP
Industrials
DDM
QTAP
Technology
DDM
QTAP
Healthcare
DDM
QTAP
Consumer Cyclical
DDM
QTAP
Consumer Defensive
DDM
QTAP
Basic Materials
DDM
QTAP
Energy
DDM
QTAP
Communication Services
DDM
QTAP
Real Estate
DDM
-
QTAP
Utilities
DDM
-
QTAP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DDM vs. QTAP — Risk / Return Rank
DDM
QTAP
DDM vs. QTAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Dow30 (DDM) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DDM | QTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.71 | 4.71 | -3.00 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.40 | 8.64 | -6.24 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 2.25 | -0.96 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.16 | 15.78 | -13.62 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.95 | 83.28 | -75.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DDM | QTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.71 | 4.71 | -3.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 | 0.75 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.75 | -0.36 |
Drawdowns
DDM vs. QTAP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DDM drawdown since its inception was -81.70%, which is greater than QTAP's maximum drawdown of -29.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDM and QTAP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DDM | QTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.70% | -29.44% | -52.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.31% | -1.69% | -17.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.62% | -13.03% | -18.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.18% | -29.44% | -10.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.13% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.33% | -5.04% | -12.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.25% | 0.32% | +4.93% |
Volatility
DDM vs. QTAP - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Ultra Dow30 (DDM) has a higher volatility of 5.91% compared to Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP) at 1.34%. This indicates that DDM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QTAP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DDM | QTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.91% | 1.34% | +4.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.55% | 3.97% | +14.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.12% | 5.57% | +18.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.51% | 18.89% | +10.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.76% | 18.78% | +15.98% |
DDM vs. QTAP - Expense Ratio Comparison
DDM has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than QTAP's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
DDM vs. QTAP - Dividend Comparison
DDM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, while QTAP has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DDM ProShares Ultra Dow30 | 0.89% | 0.94% | 1.00% | 0.27% | 0.83% | 0.18% | 0.31% | 0.62% | 0.89% | 0.68% | 1.08% | 1.23% |
QTAP Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DDM and QTAP have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DDM has higher volatility (5.91%) compared to QTAP (1.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DDM dropped -81.70% vs QTAP's -29.44%.
On 5-year performance, QTAP leads with 14.09% vs 12.69% for DDM. On fees, QTAP is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, QTAP has been the lower-risk option at 1.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QTAP has performed better with a 14.09% return vs 12.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QTAP is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for DDM.
DDM has the higher dividend yield at 0.89%, compared with 0.00% for QTAP.
They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for DDM and 0.79% for QTAP.
QTAP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.71 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DDM and QTAP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer