PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DDM vs. QQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DDM vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Dow30 (DDM) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DDM achieves a 24.32% return, which is significantly higher than QQQ's 17.04% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with DDM having a 20.08% annualized return and QQQ not far ahead at 20.75%.


DDM

1D
0.86%
1M
4.37%
6M
17.92%
YTD
24.32%
1Y
45.60%
3Y*
27.53%
5Y*
14.31%
10Y*
20.08%
ALL TIME*
14.76%

QQQ

1D
-0.90%
1M
-0.76%
6M
18.69%
YTD
17.04%
1Y
28.64%
3Y*
25.18%
5Y*
14.96%
10Y*
20.75%
ALL TIME*
10.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$16.79M$13.61M$11.73M
$34.07B$28.96B$31.85B

DDM vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DDM
ProShares Ultra Dow30
24.32%20.59%21.60%24.34%-19.48%41.97%2.14%47.98%-13.46%59.56%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
17.04%20.77%25.58%54.86%-32.58%27.42%48.62%38.96%-0.13%32.66%

Correlation

The correlation between DDM and QQQ is 0.62, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.71

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2006

0.76

The correlation between DDM and QQQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (1 year) to 0.76 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DDM vs. QQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DDM
QQQ

Financial Services

27.0%
0.2%

Industrials

17.9%
2.7%

Technology

16.3%
60.9%

Healthcare

13.4%
3.6%

Consumer Cyclical

10.4%
10.7%

Communication Services

5.2%
13.1%

Basic Materials

4.0%
1.0%

Consumer Defensive

3.9%
6.3%

Energy

1.9%
0.5%

Real Estate

-

0.1%

Utilities

-

1.1%

Financial Services

DDM
27.0%
QQQ
0.2%

Industrials

DDM
17.9%
QQQ
2.7%

Technology

DDM
16.3%
QQQ
60.9%

Healthcare

DDM
13.4%
QQQ
3.6%

Consumer Cyclical

DDM
10.4%
QQQ
10.7%

Communication Services

DDM
5.2%
QQQ
13.1%

Basic Materials

DDM
4.0%
QQQ
1.0%

Consumer Defensive

DDM
3.9%
QQQ
6.3%

Energy

DDM
1.9%
QQQ
0.5%

Real Estate

DDM

-

QQQ
0.1%

Utilities

DDM

-

QQQ
1.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DDM vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DDM
DDM Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
DDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
DDM Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
DDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
DDM Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQ
QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DDM vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Dow30 (DDM) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DDMQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.26

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.37

2.40

-0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.73

7.62

+1.10

DDM vs. QQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DDM Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is comparable to the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DDM and QQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DDM vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DDM drawdown since its inception was -81.70%, roughly equal to the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDM and QQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DDMQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.70%

-82.97%

+1.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.31%

-11.96%

-7.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.62%

-22.77%

-8.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.18%

-35.12%

-5.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.13%

-35.12%

-28.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-3.76%

+3.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.20%

-32.61%

+15.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.24%

3.77%

+1.47%

Volatility

DDM vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Ultra Dow30 (DDM) has a higher volatility of 8.29% compared to Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) at 7.44%. This indicates that DDM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DDMQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.29%

7.44%

+0.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.01%

16.38%

+3.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.12%

19.56%

+5.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.67%

22.97%

+6.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.78%

22.53%

+12.25%

DDM vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

DDM has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

DDM vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

DDM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%, more than QQQ's 0.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DDM
ProShares Ultra Dow30
0.87%0.94%1.00%0.27%0.83%0.18%0.31%0.62%0.89%0.68%1.08%1.23%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
0.42%0.45%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


DDM and QQQ have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DDM has higher volatility (8.29%) compared to QQQ (7.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DDM dropped -81.70% vs QQQ's -82.97%.

On 10-year performance, QQQ leads with 20.75% vs 20.08% for DDM. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, QQQ has been the lower-risk option at 7.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 20.75% return vs 20.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for DDM.

DDM has the higher dividend yield at 0.87%, compared with 0.42% for QQQ.

DDM is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. DDM tracks Dow Jones Industrial Average Index (200%), while QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for DDM and 0.18% for QQQ.

DDM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DDM and QQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer