PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DDLS vs. MSTZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DDLS vs. MSTZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International SmallCap Equity Fund (DDLS) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DDLS achieves a 5.87% return, which is significantly higher than MSTZ's -26.97% return.


DDLS

1D
0.63%
1M
-0.69%
6M
2.85%
YTD
5.87%
1Y
15.71%
3Y*
17.08%
5Y*
9.70%
10Y*
10.08%

MSTZ

1D
-1.53%
1M
39.32%
6M
-19.19%
YTD
-26.97%
1Y
264.10%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DDLS vs. MSTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DDLS and MSTZ is -0.31, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2024

-0.27

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DDLS vs. MSTZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DDLS
DDLS Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
DDLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DDLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
DDLS Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
DDLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
DDLS Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

MSTZ
MSTZ Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
MSTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
MSTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DDLS vs. MSTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International SmallCap Equity Fund (DDLS) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DDLSMSTZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.30

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.45

2.86

-1.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.07

5.59

-0.52

DDLS vs. MSTZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DDLS Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is comparable to the MSTZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DDLS and MSTZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DDLS vs. MSTZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DDLS drawdown since its inception was -36.80%, smaller than the maximum MSTZ drawdown of -99.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDLS and MSTZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DDLSMSTZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.80%

-99.38%

+62.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.69%

-84.89%

+74.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.07%

-97.51%

+94.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.68%

-94.53%

+88.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.06%

43.41%

-40.35%

Volatility

DDLS vs. MSTZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International SmallCap Equity Fund (DDLS) is 3.76%, while T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ) has a volatility of 56.46%. This indicates that DDLS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DDLSMSTZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.76%

56.46%

-52.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.21%

135.20%

-123.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.16%

148.41%

-135.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.79%

171.17%

-157.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.49%

171.17%

-155.68%

DDLS vs. MSTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

DDLS has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is lower than MSTZ's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

DDLS vs. MSTZ - Dividend Comparison

DDLS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.65%, while MSTZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
DDLS
WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International SmallCap Equity Fund
3.65%3.80%4.11%4.05%5.44%3.18%3.16%3.68%1.75%1.60%3.47%
MSTZ
T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DDLS and MSTZ have a correlation of -0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MSTZ has higher volatility (56.46%) compared to DDLS (3.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DDLS dropped -36.80% vs MSTZ's -99.38%.

On 1-year performance, MSTZ leads with 264.10% vs 15.71% for DDLS. On fees, DDLS is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, DDLS has been the lower-risk option at 3.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MSTZ has performed better with a 264.10% return vs 15.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DDLS is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for MSTZ.

DDLS has the higher dividend yield at 3.65%, compared with 0.00% for MSTZ.

DDLS is categorized as Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities, while MSTZ is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and REX. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for DDLS and 1.05% for MSTZ.

MSTZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DDLS and MSTZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer