DDIV vs. VFMO
DDIV (First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Dividend ETF) and VFMO (Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF) are both Momentum funds. DDIV is passively managed, while VFMO is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, DDIV returned 9.40%/yr vs 13.84%/yr for VFMO. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DDIV charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for VFMO.
Performance
DDIV vs. VFMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DDIV achieves a 7.57% return, which is significantly lower than VFMO's 23.68% return.
DDIV
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- -1.01%
- YTD
- 7.57%
- 6M
- 9.50%
- 1Y
- 20.52%
- 3Y*
- 20.53%
- 5Y*
- 9.40%
- 10Y*
- 9.72%
VFMO
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 5.53%
- YTD
- 23.68%
- 6M
- 23.37%
- 1Y
- 43.34%
- 3Y*
- 27.93%
- 5Y*
- 13.84%
- 10Y*
- —
DDIV vs. VFMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DDIV First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Dividend ETF | 7.57% | 12.23% | 27.18% | 9.95% | -12.44% | 39.96% | -3.59% | 32.40% | -13.97% |
VFMO Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF | 23.68% | 17.39% | 26.14% | 16.25% | -12.84% | 19.16% | 31.36% | 28.22% | -11.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between DDIV and VFMO is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 16, 2018 | 0.77 |
The correlation between DDIV and VFMO shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (1 year) to 0.82 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
DDIV vs. VFMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DDIV
VFMO
Energy
Financial Services
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Technology
Energy
DDIV
VFMO
Financial Services
DDIV
VFMO
Real Estate
DDIV
VFMO
Consumer Defensive
DDIV
VFMO
Industrials
DDIV
VFMO
Consumer Cyclical
DDIV
VFMO
Utilities
DDIV
VFMO
Healthcare
DDIV
VFMO
Basic Materials
DDIV
VFMO
Communication Services
DDIV
VFMO
Technology
DDIV
VFMO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DDIV vs. VFMO — Risk / Return Rank
DDIV
VFMO
DDIV vs. VFMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Dividend ETF (DDIV) and Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (VFMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DDIV | VFMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.35 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.82 | 3.96 | -2.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.71 | 14.97 | -8.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DDIV | VFMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.44 | 2.05 | -0.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 | 0.64 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.66 | -0.19 |
Drawdowns
DDIV vs. VFMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DDIV drawdown since its inception was -47.56%, which is greater than VFMO's maximum drawdown of -36.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDIV and VFMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DDIV | VFMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.56% | -36.77% | -10.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.31% | -10.98% | -0.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.97% | -24.40% | +5.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.10% | -25.80% | +4.70% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.56% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.86% | 0.00% | -1.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.02% | -7.77% | +1.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.07% | 2.90% | +0.17% |
Volatility
DDIV vs. VFMO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Dividend ETF (DDIV) is 2.62%, while Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (VFMO) has a volatility of 6.20%. This indicates that DDIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VFMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DDIV | VFMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.62% | 6.20% | -3.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.72% | 16.37% | -4.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.29% | 21.20% | -6.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.66% | 21.70% | -3.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.90% | 23.57% | -3.67% |
DDIV vs. VFMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
DDIV has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than VFMO's 0.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
DDIV vs. VFMO - Dividend Comparison
DDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%, more than VFMO's 0.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DDIV First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Dividend ETF | 1.61% | 1.94% | 2.22% | 3.18% | 3.60% | 2.43% | 2.63% | 2.93% | 3.27% |
VFMO Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF | 0.63% | 0.82% | 0.72% | 0.89% | 1.72% | 0.81% | 0.45% | 1.22% | 0.70% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DDIV and VFMO have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VFMO has higher volatility (6.20%) compared to DDIV (2.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DDIV dropped -47.56% vs VFMO's -36.77%.
On 5-year performance, VFMO leads with 13.84% vs 9.40% for DDIV. On fees, VFMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, DDIV has been the lower-risk option at 2.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, VFMO has performed better with a 13.84% return vs 9.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VFMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for DDIV.
DDIV has the higher dividend yield at 1.61%, compared with 0.63% for VFMO.
They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for DDIV and 0.13% for VFMO.
VFMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DDIV and VFMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer