PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DDIV vs. SPVM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DDIV vs. SPVM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Dividend ETF (DDIV) and Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF (SPVM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DDIV achieves a 14.18% return, which is significantly lower than SPVM's 15.57% return. Over the past 10 years, DDIV has underperformed SPVM with an annualized return of 10.11%, while SPVM has yielded a comparatively higher 12.16% annualized return.


DDIV

1D
0.39%
1M
3.93%
6M
9.75%
YTD
14.18%
1Y
26.26%
3Y*
20.51%
5Y*
12.00%
10Y*
10.11%
ALL TIME*
9.22%

SPVM

1D
0.34%
1M
2.66%
6M
11.57%
YTD
15.57%
1Y
30.92%
3Y*
18.76%
5Y*
12.22%
10Y*
12.16%
ALL TIME*
12.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$943.17K$544.16K$292.85K
$1.05M$1.12M$1.21M

DDIV vs. SPVM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DDIV
First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Dividend ETF
14.18%12.23%27.18%9.95%-12.44%39.96%-3.59%32.40%-16.50%11.31%
SPVM
Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF
15.57%20.47%15.64%5.53%-2.10%28.86%-3.18%29.33%-9.17%14.70%

Correlation

The correlation between DDIV and SPVM is 0.82, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 11, 2014

0.78

The correlation between DDIV and SPVM shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (all time) to 0.89 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DDIV vs. SPVM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DDIV
SPVM

Energy

26.5%
11.8%

Financial Services

22.8%
36.8%

Real Estate

15.5%
2.1%

Consumer Defensive

7.3%
4.7%

Industrials

6.8%
9.4%

Consumer Cyclical

5.5%
3.7%

Utilities

5.4%
13.4%

Healthcare

4.0%
8.6%

Basic Materials

2.9%
3.5%

Communication Services

2.3%
2.7%

Technology

1.0%
6.2%

Energy

DDIV
26.5%
SPVM
11.8%

Financial Services

DDIV
22.8%
SPVM
36.8%

Real Estate

DDIV
15.5%
SPVM
2.1%

Consumer Defensive

DDIV
7.3%
SPVM
4.7%

Industrials

DDIV
6.8%
SPVM
9.4%

Consumer Cyclical

DDIV
5.5%
SPVM
3.7%

Utilities

DDIV
5.4%
SPVM
13.4%

Healthcare

DDIV
4.0%
SPVM
8.6%

Basic Materials

DDIV
2.9%
SPVM
3.5%

Communication Services

DDIV
2.3%
SPVM
2.7%

Technology

DDIV
1.0%
SPVM
6.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DDIV vs. SPVM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DDIV
DDIV Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
DDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
DDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
DDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
DDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

SPVM
SPVM Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
SPVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPVM Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
SPVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPVM Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DDIV vs. SPVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Dividend ETF (DDIV) and Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF (SPVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DDIVSPVMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.48

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.33

4.73

-2.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.58

18.23

-9.65

DDIV vs. SPVM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DDIV Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is lower than the SPVM Sharpe Ratio of 2.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DDIV and SPVM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DDIV vs. SPVM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DDIV drawdown since its inception was -47.56%, roughly equal to the maximum SPVM drawdown of -45.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDIV and SPVM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DDIVSPVMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.56%

-45.35%

-2.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.31%

-6.57%

-4.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.97%

-18.66%

-0.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.10%

-19.48%

-1.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.56%

-45.35%

-2.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.15%

-1.01%

-0.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.95%

-4.94%

-1.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.07%

1.70%

+1.37%

Volatility

DDIV vs. SPVM - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Dividend ETF (DDIV) has a higher volatility of 3.60% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF (SPVM) at 3.02%. This indicates that DDIV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPVM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DDIVSPVMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.60%

3.02%

+0.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.39%

7.73%

+3.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.42%

11.35%

+3.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.25%

16.57%

+1.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.91%

19.51%

+0.40%

DDIV vs. SPVM - Expense Ratio Comparison

DDIV has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than SPVM's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

DDIV vs. SPVM - Dividend Comparison

DDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.52%, less than SPVM's 1.92% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DDIV
First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Dividend ETF
1.52%1.94%2.22%3.18%3.60%2.43%2.63%2.93%3.27%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPVM
Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF
1.92%2.02%1.91%2.45%2.33%1.41%2.11%2.40%3.10%1.68%2.80%2.67%

Frequently Asked Questions


DDIV and SPVM have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DDIV has higher volatility (3.60%) compared to SPVM (3.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DDIV dropped -47.56% vs SPVM's -45.35%.

On 10-year performance, SPVM leads with 12.16% vs 10.11% for DDIV. On fees, SPVM is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, SPVM has been the lower-risk option at 3.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPVM has performed better with a 12.16% return vs 10.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPVM is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for DDIV.

SPVM has the higher dividend yield at 1.92%, compared with 1.52% for DDIV.

DDIV tracks Dorsey Wright Momentum Plus Dividend Yield Index, while SPVM tracks S&P 500 High Momentum Value Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for DDIV and 0.39% for SPVM.

SPVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.74 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DDIV and SPVM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer