PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DDIV vs. SPMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DDIV vs. SPMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Dividend ETF (DDIV) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DDIV achieves a 9.05% return, which is significantly lower than SPMO's 29.91% return. Over the past 10 years, DDIV has underperformed SPMO with an annualized return of 10.13%, while SPMO has yielded a comparatively higher 21.03% annualized return.


DDIV

1D
0.56%
1M
0.15%
YTD
9.05%
6M
7.35%
1Y
21.91%
3Y*
21.11%
5Y*
10.48%
10Y*
10.13%

SPMO

1D
-4.53%
1M
6.65%
YTD
29.91%
6M
28.13%
1Y
43.55%
3Y*
42.47%
5Y*
22.89%
10Y*
21.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DDIV vs. SPMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DDIV
First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Dividend ETF
9.05%12.23%27.18%9.95%-12.44%39.96%-3.59%32.40%-16.50%11.31%
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
29.91%26.58%45.82%17.56%-10.45%22.64%28.25%25.93%-0.92%27.76%

Correlation

The correlation between DDIV and SPMO is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2015

0.58

The correlation between DDIV and SPMO shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (1 year) to 0.68 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DDIV vs. SPMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DDIV
SPMO

Energy

27.0%
2.8%

Financial Services

22.2%
5.8%

Real Estate

15.4%
0.9%

Consumer Defensive

7.6%
3.8%

Industrials

6.4%
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

5.4%
1.1%

Utilities

5.2%
2.6%

Healthcare

4.0%
5.9%

Basic Materials

3.0%
1.5%

Communication Services

2.8%
8.0%

Technology

1.0%
56.8%

Energy

DDIV
27.0%
SPMO
2.8%

Financial Services

DDIV
22.2%
SPMO
5.8%

Real Estate

DDIV
15.4%
SPMO
0.9%

Consumer Defensive

DDIV
7.6%
SPMO
3.8%

Industrials

DDIV
6.4%
SPMO
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

DDIV
5.4%
SPMO
1.1%

Utilities

DDIV
5.2%
SPMO
2.6%

Healthcare

DDIV
4.0%
SPMO
5.9%

Basic Materials

DDIV
3.0%
SPMO
1.5%

Communication Services

DDIV
2.8%
SPMO
8.0%

Technology

DDIV
1.0%
SPMO
56.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DDIV vs. SPMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DDIV
DDIV Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
DDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
DDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
DDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
DDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

SPMO
SPMO Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
SPMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPMO Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
SPMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPMO Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DDIV vs. SPMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Dividend ETF (DDIV) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DDIVSPMODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.39

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.95

3.45

-1.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.14

12.97

-5.83

DDIV vs. SPMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DDIV Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is comparable to the SPMO Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DDIV and SPMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DDIV vs. SPMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DDIV drawdown since its inception was -47.56%, which is greater than SPMO's maximum drawdown of -30.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDIV and SPMO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DDIVSPMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.56%

-30.95%

-16.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.31%

-12.70%

+1.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.97%

-20.13%

+1.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.10%

-22.74%

+1.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.56%

-30.95%

-16.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.51%

-4.53%

+4.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.00%

-4.59%

-1.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.07%

3.37%

-0.30%

Volatility

DDIV vs. SPMO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Dividend ETF (DDIV) is 3.14%, while Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) has a volatility of 11.75%. This indicates that DDIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DDIVSPMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.14%

11.75%

-8.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.64%

17.78%

-6.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.36%

20.55%

-6.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.54%

19.88%

-1.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.90%

20.60%

-0.70%

DDIV vs. SPMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

DDIV has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than SPMO's 0.13% expense ratio.


Dividends

DDIV vs. SPMO - Dividend Comparison

DDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.59%, more than SPMO's 0.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DDIV
First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Dividend ETF
1.59%1.94%2.22%3.18%3.60%2.43%2.63%2.93%3.27%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
0.68%0.73%0.48%1.63%1.66%0.52%1.27%1.39%1.05%0.77%1.94%0.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


DDIV and SPMO have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPMO has higher volatility (11.75%) compared to DDIV (3.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DDIV dropped -47.56% vs SPMO's -30.95%.

On 10-year performance, SPMO leads with 21.03% vs 10.13% for DDIV. On fees, SPMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, DDIV has been the lower-risk option at 3.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPMO has performed better with a 21.03% return vs 10.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for DDIV.

DDIV has the higher dividend yield at 1.59%, compared with 0.68% for SPMO.

DDIV tracks Dorsey Wright Momentum Plus Dividend Yield Index, while SPMO tracks S&P 500 Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for DDIV and 0.13% for SPMO.

SPMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DDIV and SPMO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer