PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DDFO vs. RSBY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DDFO vs. RSBY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - October (DDFO) and Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF (RSBY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DDFO achieves a 3.31% return, which is significantly lower than RSBY's 19.04% return.


DDFO

1D
-0.40%
1M
0.25%
YTD
3.31%
6M
3.74%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

RSBY

1D
0.19%
1M
-1.29%
YTD
19.04%
6M
15.93%
1Y
20.17%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DDFO vs. RSBY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DDFO and RSBY is -0.31, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2025

-0.31

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DDFO vs. RSBY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DDFO

RSBY
RSBY Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
RSBY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSBY Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSBY Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
RSBY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSBY Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DDFO vs. RSBY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - October (DDFO) and Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF (RSBY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

DDFO vs. RSBY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DDFORSBYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.72

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.63

-0.19

+1.82

Drawdowns

DDFO vs. RSBY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DDFO drawdown since its inception was -2.79%, smaller than the maximum RSBY drawdown of -23.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDFO and RSBY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DDFORSBYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.79%

-23.32%

+20.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.53%

-6.04%

+5.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.42%

-13.76%

+13.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.40%

Volatility

DDFO vs. RSBY - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DDFORSBYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.70%

11.78%

-7.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.70%

13.53%

-8.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.70%

13.53%

-8.83%

DDFO vs. RSBY - Expense Ratio Comparison

DDFO has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than RSBY's 0.98% expense ratio.


Dividends

DDFO vs. RSBY - Dividend Comparison

DDFO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RSBY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.74%.


Frequently Asked Questions


DDFO and RSBY have a correlation of -0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, DDFO is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DDFO is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for RSBY.

RSBY has the higher dividend yield at 1.74%, compared with 0.00% for DDFO.

DDFO is categorized as Defined Outcome, while RSBY is Multistrategy. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Return Stacked. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for DDFO and 0.98% for RSBY.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DDFO and RSBY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer