DDFO vs. LOUP
DDFO (Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - October) and LOUP (Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DDFO is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust, while LOUP is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Deepwater Frontier Tech Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DDFO charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for LOUP.
Performance
DDFO vs. LOUP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DDFO achieves a 4.46% return, which is significantly lower than LOUP's 23.47% return.
DDFO
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 0.94%
- 6M
- 4.08%
- YTD
- 4.46%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LOUP
- 1D
- -1.79%
- 1M
- 2.13%
- 6M
- 16.80%
- YTD
- 23.47%
- 1Y
- 53.81%
- 3Y*
- 33.41%
- 5Y*
- 12.09%
- 10Y*
- —
DDFO vs. LOUP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DDFO Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - October | 4.46% | 1.91% |
LOUP Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF | 23.47% | 3.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between DDFO and LOUP is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2025 | 0.70 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DDFO vs. LOUP — Risk / Return Rank
DDFO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
LOUP
DDFO vs. LOUP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - October (DDFO) and Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF (LOUP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DDFO | LOUP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.29 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.56 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 8.34 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DDFO vs. LOUP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DDFO drawdown since its inception was -2.79%, smaller than the maximum LOUP drawdown of -58.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDFO and LOUP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DDFO | LOUP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.79% | -58.68% | +55.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -21.00% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -35.23% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -55.63% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -5.50% | +5.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.39% | -19.85% | +19.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 6.45% | — |
Volatility
DDFO vs. LOUP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DDFO | LOUP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 10.32% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 24.04% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.53% | 30.18% | -25.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.53% | 32.72% | -28.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.53% | 32.05% | -27.52% |
DDFO vs. LOUP - Expense Ratio Comparison
DDFO has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than LOUP's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
DDFO vs. LOUP - Dividend Comparison
Neither DDFO nor LOUP has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
DDFO and LOUP have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LOUP is cheaper at 0.70% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LOUP is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for DDFO.
DDFO and LOUP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
DDFO is categorized as Defined Outcome, while LOUP is Technology Equities. DDFO tracks SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust, while LOUP tracks Deepwater Frontier Tech Index. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for DDFO and 0.70% for LOUP.
Find the right allocation for DDFO and LOUP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer