PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DDFO vs. BPH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DDFO vs. BPH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - October (DDFO) and BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF (BPH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


DDFO

1D
-0.40%
1M
0.25%
YTD
3.31%
6M
3.74%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BPH

1D
-1.59%
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DDFO vs. BPH - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DDFO and BPH is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2026

0.33

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DDFO vs. BPH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - October (DDFO) and BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF (BPH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

DDFO vs. BPH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DDFOBPHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.63

2.77

-1.14

Drawdowns

DDFO vs. BPH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DDFO drawdown since its inception was -2.79%, which is greater than BPH's maximum drawdown of -2.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDFO and BPH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DDFOBPHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.79%

-2.35%

-0.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.53%

-1.59%

+1.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.42%

-1.01%

+0.59%

Volatility

DDFO vs. BPH - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DDFOBPHDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.70%

24.64%

-19.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.70%

24.64%

-19.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.70%

24.64%

-19.94%

DDFO vs. BPH - Expense Ratio Comparison

DDFO has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than BPH's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

DDFO vs. BPH - Dividend Comparison

Neither DDFO nor BPH has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


DDFO and BPH have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BPH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BPH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for DDFO.

DDFO and BPH have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

DDFO is categorized as Defined Outcome, while BPH is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Precidian. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for DDFO and 0.19% for BPH.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DDFO and BPH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer