DDFL vs. UXJL
DDFL (Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - July) and UXJL (FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DDFL charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for UXJL.
Performance
DDFL vs. UXJL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DDFL achieves a 2.83% return, which is significantly lower than UXJL's 12.29% return.
DDFL
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.67%
- YTD
- 2.83%
- 6M
- 3.63%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UXJL
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- 5.57%
- YTD
- 12.29%
- 6M
- 12.01%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DDFL vs. UXJL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DDFL Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - July | 2.83% | 4.04% |
UXJL FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July | 12.29% | 9.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between DDFL and UXJL is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 22, 2025 | 0.77 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DDFL vs. UXJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - July (DDFL) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July (UXJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DDFL | UXJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.59 | 1.91 | +0.68 |
Drawdowns
DDFL vs. UXJL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DDFL drawdown since its inception was -1.63%, smaller than the maximum UXJL drawdown of -10.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDFL and UXJL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DDFL | UXJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.63% | -10.29% | +8.66% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.02% | -0.31% | +0.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.19% | -1.51% | +1.32% |
Volatility
DDFL vs. UXJL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DDFL | UXJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.25% | 13.88% | -10.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.25% | 13.88% | -10.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.25% | 13.88% | -10.63% |
DDFL vs. UXJL - Expense Ratio Comparison
DDFL has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than UXJL's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
DDFL vs. UXJL - Dividend Comparison
Neither DDFL nor UXJL has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
DDFL and UXJL have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DDFL is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DDFL is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for UXJL.
DDFL and UXJL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Innovator and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for DDFL and 0.85% for UXJL.
Find the right allocation for DDFL and UXJL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer