DDFL vs. SPY
DDFL (Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - July) and SPY (State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DDFL is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Innovator, while SPY is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. DDFL is actively managed, while SPY is passively managed. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DDFL charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for SPY.
Performance
DDFL vs. SPY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DDFL achieves a 2.93% return, which is significantly lower than SPY's 8.15% return.
DDFL
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 0.24%
- YTD
- 2.93%
- 6M
- 3.17%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPY
- 1D
- -1.45%
- 1M
- -1.36%
- YTD
- 8.15%
- 6M
- 7.20%
- 1Y
- 23.59%
- 3Y*
- 20.68%
- 5Y*
- 13.05%
- 10Y*
- 15.53%
DDFL vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DDFL Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - July | 2.93% | 2.85% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 8.15% | 11.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between DDFL and SPY is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2025 | 0.75 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DDFL vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank
DDFL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SPY
DDFL vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - July (DDFL) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DDFL | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.34 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.67 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 11.92 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DDFL vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DDFL drawdown since its inception was -1.83%, smaller than the maximum SPY drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDFL and SPY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DDFL | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.83% | -55.19% | +53.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.88% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.76% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.50% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.05% | -3.17% | +3.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.31% | -9.04% | +8.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.98% | — |
Volatility
DDFL vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DDFL | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.87% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.85% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.70% | 12.50% | -8.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.70% | 17.15% | -13.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.70% | 17.95% | -14.25% |
DDFL vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison
DDFL has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
DDFL vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison
DDFL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DDFL Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - July | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 1.03% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.40% | 1.65% | 1.20% | 1.52% | 1.75% | 2.04% | 1.80% | 2.03% | 2.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DDFL and SPY have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPY is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPY is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for DDFL.
SPY has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.00% for DDFL.
DDFL is categorized as Defined Outcome, while SPY is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for DDFL and 0.09% for SPY.
Find the right allocation for DDFL and SPY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer