PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DDFF vs. WNTR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DDFF vs. WNTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - February (DDFF) and YieldMax MSTR Short Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


DDFF

1D
0.22%
1M
0.60%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

WNTR

1D
3.26%
1M
8.13%
6M
14.92%
YTD
10.75%
1Y
107.38%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
47.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$85.90K$147.25K$327.77K
$4.02M$3.86M$3.95M

DDFF vs. WNTR - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DDFF and WNTR is -0.53, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2026

-0.53

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DDFF vs. WNTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DDFF

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


WNTR
WNTR Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
WNTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WNTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
WNTR Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
WNTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
WNTR Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DDFF vs. WNTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - February (DDFF) and YieldMax MSTR Short Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DDFFWNTRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.87

DDFF vs. WNTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DDFF vs. WNTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DDFF drawdown since its inception was -3.72%, smaller than the maximum WNTR drawdown of -42.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDFF and WNTR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DDFFWNTRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.72%

-42.65%

+38.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-42.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-9.64%

+9.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.52%

-20.18%

+19.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.81%

Volatility

DDFF vs. WNTR - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DDFFWNTRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

47.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.38%

54.68%

-49.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.38%

53.42%

-48.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.38%

53.42%

-48.04%

DDFF vs. WNTR - Expense Ratio Comparison

DDFF has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than WNTR's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

DDFF vs. WNTR - Dividend Comparison

DDFF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while WNTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 107.02%.


Frequently Asked Questions


DDFF and WNTR have a correlation of -0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, DDFF is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DDFF is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for WNTR.

WNTR has the higher dividend yield at 107.02%, compared with 0.00% for DDFF.

DDFF is categorized as Defined Outcome, while WNTR is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for DDFF and 1.00% for WNTR.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DDFF and WNTR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer