PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DDFF vs. POCT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DDFF vs. POCT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - February (DDFF) and Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October (POCT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


DDFF

1D
-0.75%
1M
0.25%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

POCT

1D
-0.93%
1M
0.42%
YTD
4.58%
6M
5.03%
1Y
14.08%
3Y*
11.85%
5Y*
9.66%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DDFF vs. POCT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DDFF and POCT is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2026

0.86

DDFF vs. POCT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DDFF
POCT

Technology

36.2%
36.2%

Financial Services

11.9%
11.9%

Communication Services

10.9%
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
10.1%

Healthcare

8.4%
8.4%

Industrials

8.1%
8.1%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
4.9%

Energy

3.5%
3.5%

Utilities

2.3%
2.3%

Real Estate

1.9%
1.9%

Basic Materials

1.8%
1.8%

Technology

DDFF
36.2%
POCT
36.2%

Financial Services

DDFF
11.9%
POCT
11.9%

Communication Services

DDFF
10.9%
POCT
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

DDFF
10.1%
POCT
10.1%

Healthcare

DDFF
8.4%
POCT
8.4%

Industrials

DDFF
8.1%
POCT
8.1%

Consumer Defensive

DDFF
4.9%
POCT
4.9%

Energy

DDFF
3.5%
POCT
3.5%

Utilities

DDFF
2.3%
POCT
2.3%

Real Estate

DDFF
1.9%
POCT
1.9%

Basic Materials

DDFF
1.8%
POCT
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DDFF vs. POCT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DDFF

POCT
POCT Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
POCT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
POCT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
POCT Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
POCT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
POCT Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DDFF vs. POCT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - February (DDFF) and Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October (POCT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

DDFF vs. POCT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DDFFPOCTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.30

0.86

+0.44

Drawdowns

DDFF vs. POCT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DDFF drawdown since its inception was -3.72%, smaller than the maximum POCT drawdown of -18.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDFF and POCT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DDFFPOCTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.72%

-18.80%

+15.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.80%

-0.93%

+0.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.62%

-1.50%

+0.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.86%

Volatility

DDFF vs. POCT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DDFFPOCTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.90%

6.23%

-0.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.90%

7.94%

-2.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.90%

10.23%

-4.33%

DDFF vs. POCT - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both DDFF and POCT have an expense ratio of 0.79%.


Dividends

DDFF vs. POCT - Dividend Comparison

Neither DDFF nor POCT has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
DDFF
Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - February
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
POCT
Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%2.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


DDFF and POCT have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DDFF and POCT have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.

DDFF and POCT have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DDFF and POCT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer