DDFF vs. FFTY
DDFF (Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - February) and FFTY (Innovator IBD 50 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DDFF is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Innovator, while FFTY is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the IBD 50 Index. DDFF is actively managed, while FFTY is passively managed. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DDFF charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for FFTY.
Performance
DDFF vs. FFTY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
DDFF
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.48%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FFTY
- 1D
- 2.30%
- 1M
- 10.03%
- YTD
- 26.26%
- 6M
- 22.29%
- 1Y
- 43.43%
- 3Y*
- 23.01%
- 5Y*
- 0.68%
- 10Y*
- 8.38%
DDFF vs. FFTY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
DDFF Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - February | 3.29% |
FFTY Innovator IBD 50 ETF | 22.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between DDFF and FFTY is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2026 | 0.60 |
DDFF vs. FFTY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DDFF
FFTY
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
Technology
DDFF
FFTY
Financial Services
DDFF
FFTY
Communication Services
DDFF
FFTY
Consumer Cyclical
DDFF
FFTY
Healthcare
DDFF
FFTY
Industrials
DDFF
FFTY
Consumer Defensive
DDFF
FFTY
Energy
DDFF
FFTY
Utilities
DDFF
FFTY
Real Estate
DDFF
FFTY
-
Basic Materials
DDFF
FFTY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DDFF vs. FFTY — Risk / Return Rank
DDFF
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FFTY
DDFF vs. FFTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - February (DDFF) and Innovator IBD 50 ETF (FFTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DDFF | FFTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.22 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.87 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 4.94 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DDFF vs. FFTY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DDFF drawdown since its inception was -3.72%, smaller than the maximum FFTY drawdown of -59.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDFF and FFTY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DDFF | FFTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.72% | -59.46% | +55.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -23.29% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -29.60% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -59.46% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -59.46% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.18% | -11.01% | +10.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.59% | -22.34% | +21.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 8.81% | — |
Volatility
DDFF vs. FFTY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DDFF | FFTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 12.58% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 28.19% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.81% | 35.80% | -29.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.81% | 29.57% | -23.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.81% | 27.65% | -21.84% |
DDFF vs. FFTY - Expense Ratio Comparison
DDFF has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than FFTY's 0.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
DDFF vs. FFTY - Dividend Comparison
DDFF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FFTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.07%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DDFF Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - February | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FFTY Innovator IBD 50 ETF | 1.07% | 1.35% | 0.91% | 0.65% | 2.75% | 0.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DDFF and FFTY have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DDFF is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DDFF is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FFTY.
FFTY has the higher dividend yield at 1.07%, compared with 0.00% for DDFF.
DDFF is categorized as Defined Outcome, while FFTY is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for DDFF and 0.80% for FFTY.
Find the right allocation for DDFF and FFTY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer