DDFF vs. SMST
DDFF (Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - February) and SMST (Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DDFF is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Innovator, while SMST is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by Defiance. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.52, they often move in opposite directions. DDFF charges 0.79%/yr vs 1.29%/yr for SMST.
Performance
DDFF vs. SMST - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
DDFF
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- 0.98%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SMST
- 1D
- -1.67%
- 1M
- 37.17%
- 6M
- -24.18%
- YTD
- -31.56%
- 1Y
- 223.04%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DDFF vs. SMST - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
DDFF Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - February | 3.86% |
SMST Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF | -24.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between DDFF and SMST is -0.52, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2026 | -0.52 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DDFF vs. SMST — Risk / Return Rank
DDFF
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SMST
DDFF vs. SMST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - February (DDFF) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF (SMST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DDFF | SMST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.29 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.39 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 4.64 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DDFF vs. SMST - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DDFF drawdown since its inception was -3.72%, smaller than the maximum SMST drawdown of -99.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDFF and SMST.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DDFF | SMST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.72% | -99.25% | +95.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -85.39% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -97.31% | +97.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.55% | -90.88% | +90.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 43.98% | — |
Volatility
DDFF vs. SMST - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DDFF | SMST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 56.47% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 135.94% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.58% | 149.09% | -143.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.58% | 167.87% | -162.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.58% | 167.87% | -162.29% |
DDFF vs. SMST - Expense Ratio Comparison
DDFF has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than SMST's 1.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
DDFF vs. SMST - Dividend Comparison
Neither DDFF nor SMST has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
DDFF and SMST have a correlation of -0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DDFF is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DDFF is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for SMST.
DDFF and SMST have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
DDFF is categorized as Defined Outcome, while SMST is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for DDFF and 1.29% for SMST.
Find the right allocation for DDFF and SMST
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer