PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DDFF vs. DMAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DDFF vs. DMAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - February (DDFF) and iShares Large Cap Max Buffer December ETF (DMAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


DDFF

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.48%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DMAX

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.22%
YTD
2.34%
6M
2.59%
1Y
8.23%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DDFF vs. DMAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DDFF and DMAX is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2026

0.84

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DDFF vs. DMAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DDFF

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


DMAX
DMAX Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
DMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
DMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
DMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
DMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DDFF vs. DMAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - February (DDFF) and iShares Large Cap Max Buffer December ETF (DMAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DDFFDMAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.76

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

29.41

DDFF vs. DMAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DDFF vs. DMAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DDFF drawdown since its inception was -3.72%, which is greater than DMAX's maximum drawdown of -3.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDFF and DMAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DDFFDMAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.72%

-3.37%

-0.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.18%

-0.24%

+0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.59%

-0.38%

-0.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.28%

Volatility

DDFF vs. DMAX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DDFFDMAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.81%

2.34%

+3.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.81%

3.38%

+2.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.81%

3.38%

+2.43%

DDFF vs. DMAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DDFF has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than DMAX's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

DDFF vs. DMAX - Dividend Comparison

DDFF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%.


Frequently Asked Questions


DDFF and DMAX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, DMAX is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DMAX is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for DDFF.

DMAX has the higher dividend yield at 1.15%, compared with 0.00% for DDFF.

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for DDFF and 0.50% for DMAX.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DDFF and DMAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer