PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DDFF vs. BILZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DDFF vs. BILZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - February (DDFF) and PIMCO Ultra Short Government Active Exchange-Traded Fund (BILZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


DDFF

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.48%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BILZ

1D
0.00%
1M
0.25%
YTD
1.64%
6M
1.75%
1Y
3.89%
3Y*
4.67%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DDFF vs. BILZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DDFF and BILZ is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2026

-0.16

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DDFF vs. BILZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DDFF

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


BILZ
BILZ Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
BILZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BILZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
BILZ Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
BILZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
BILZ Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DDFF vs. BILZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - February (DDFF) and PIMCO Ultra Short Government Active Exchange-Traded Fund (BILZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DDFFBILZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

47.43

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

197.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1,898.07

DDFF vs. BILZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DDFF vs. BILZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DDFF drawdown since its inception was -3.72%, which is greater than BILZ's maximum drawdown of -0.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDFF and BILZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DDFFBILZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.72%

-0.52%

-3.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.18%

0.00%

-0.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.59%

-0.01%

-0.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.00%

Volatility

DDFF vs. BILZ - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DDFFBILZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.81%

0.21%

+5.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.81%

0.52%

+5.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.81%

0.52%

+5.29%

DDFF vs. BILZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

DDFF has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than BILZ's 0.14% expense ratio.


Dividends

DDFF vs. BILZ - Dividend Comparison

DDFF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BILZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.07%.


Frequently Asked Questions


DDFF and BILZ have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BILZ is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BILZ is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for DDFF.

BILZ has the higher dividend yield at 4.07%, compared with 0.00% for DDFF.

DDFF is categorized as Defined Outcome, while BILZ is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for DDFF and 0.14% for BILZ.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DDFF and BILZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer