PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DDDD vs. ACII
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DDDD vs. ACII - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax U.S. Stocks Target Double Distribution ETF (DDDD) and Innovator Index Autocallable Income Strategy ETF (ACII). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


DDDD

1D
0.05%
1M
2.56%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ACII

1D
-0.95%
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DDDD vs. ACII - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DDDD and ACII is -0.60, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026

-0.60

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DDDD vs. ACII - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax U.S. Stocks Target Double Distribution ETF (DDDD) and Innovator Index Autocallable Income Strategy ETF (ACII). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

DDDD vs. ACII - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DDDDACIIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.55

-7.55

+10.10

Drawdowns

DDDD vs. ACII - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DDDD drawdown since its inception was -1.88%, which is greater than ACII's maximum drawdown of -1.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDDD and ACII.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DDDDACIIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.88%

-1.27%

-0.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.22%

-1.27%

+0.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.60%

-0.42%

-0.18%

Volatility

DDDD vs. ACII - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DDDDACIIDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.69%

7.65%

+2.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.69%

7.65%

+2.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.69%

7.65%

+2.04%

DDDD vs. ACII - Expense Ratio Comparison

DDDD has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than ACII's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

DDDD vs. ACII - Dividend Comparison

DDDD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ACII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%.


Frequently Asked Questions


DDDD and ACII have a correlation of -0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ACII is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ACII is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for DDDD.

ACII has the higher dividend yield at 0.74%, compared with 0.00% for DDDD.

They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for DDDD and 0.79% for ACII.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DDDD and ACII

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer