PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DD vs. AB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

DD vs. AB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DuPont de Nemours, Inc. (DD) and AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. (AB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DD achieves a 21.17% return, which is significantly higher than AB's 0.21% return.


DD

1D
-1.42%
1M
6.84%
YTD
21.17%
6M
22.82%
1Y
74.50%
3Y*
19.17%
5Y*
8.25%
10Y*

AB

1D
-0.43%
1M
-4.48%
YTD
0.21%
6M
-5.97%
1Y
-0.56%
3Y*
10.52%
5Y*
4.42%
10Y*
14.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DD vs. AB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
DD
DuPont de Nemours, Inc.
21.17%28.77%1.04%14.36%-13.36%15.41%13.28%-14.90%
AB
AllianceBernstein Holding L.P.
0.21%13.36%30.40%-2.29%-23.46%56.27%23.00%14.84%

Correlation

The correlation between DD and AB is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2019

0.44

The correlation between DD and AB shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (1 year) to 0.44 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

DD:

$19.80B

AB:

$3.41B

EPS

DD:

-$0.10

AB:

$3.22

PS Ratio

DD:

2.06

AB:

14.25

PB Ratio

DD:

1.41

AB:

2.70

Total Revenue (TTM)

DD:

$9.70B

AB:

$250.00M

Gross Profit (TTM)

DD:

$2.68B

AB:

$250.00M

EBITDA (TTM)

DD:

$1.54B

AB:

$252.50M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DD vs. AB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DD
DD Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
DD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
DD Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
DD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
DD Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

AB
AB Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
AB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AB Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
AB Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
AB Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
AB Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DD vs. AB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DuPont de Nemours, Inc. (DD) and AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. (AB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DDABDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.01

+0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.33

-0.04

+4.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.67

-0.08

+13.76

DD vs. AB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DD Sharpe Ratio is 2.45, which is higher than the AB Sharpe Ratio of -0.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DD and AB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DDABDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.45

-0.03

+2.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

0.16

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

0.46

-0.21

Drawdowns

DD vs. AB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DD drawdown since its inception was -62.03%, smaller than the maximum AB drawdown of -87.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DD and AB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DDABDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.03%

-87.65%

+25.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.31%

-14.68%

-2.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.84%

-22.27%

-15.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.22%

-45.76%

+5.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-58.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.47%

-9.90%

+4.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.59%

-26.22%

+11.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.47%

6.60%

-1.13%

Volatility

DD vs. AB - Volatility Comparison

DuPont de Nemours, Inc. (DD) has a higher volatility of 12.89% compared to AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. (AB) at 4.54%. This indicates that DD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DDABDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.89%

4.54%

+8.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.82%

18.55%

+4.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.62%

22.40%

+8.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.94%

28.25%

+1.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.79%

32.39%

+1.40%

Dividends

DD vs. AB - Dividend Comparison

DD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 101.86%, more than AB's 9.25% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AB
AllianceBernstein Holding L.P.
9.25%9.02%8.03%8.44%10.30%7.33%8.26%7.67%10.54%8.50%7.46%8.09%
DD
DuPont de Nemours, Inc.
101.86%121.72%1.99%1.87%1.92%1.49%1.69%0.93%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

DD vs. AB - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between DuPont de Nemours, Inc. and AllianceBernstein Holding L.P.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B3.00B3.50B20222023202420252026
1.68B
0
(DD) Total Revenue
(AB) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


DD and AB have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DD has higher volatility (12.89%) compared to AB (4.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DD dropped -62.03% vs AB's -87.65%.

DD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs -0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DD and AB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer