DCMT vs. DBND

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF (DCMT) and DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF (DBND).

DCMT and DBND are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. DCMT is an actively managed fund by DoubleLine. It was launched on Jan 31, 2024. DBND is a passively managed fund by DoubleLine that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index. It was launched on Mar 31, 2022.

Performance

DCMT vs. DBND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF (DCMT) and DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF (DBND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

DCMT vs. DBND - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
DCMT DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF	27.72%	6.04%	4.96%
DBND DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF	-0.49%	7.41%	2.38%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DCMT achieves a 27.72% return, which is significantly higher than DBND's -0.49% return.

DCMT

• 1D: -1.56%
• 1M: 15.33%
• YTD: 27.72%
• 6M: 27.84%
• 1Y: 28.30%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DBND

• 1D: 0.33%
• 1M: -2.07%
• YTD: -0.49%
• 6M: 0.76%
• 1Y: 4.02%
• 3Y*: 4.30%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DCMT vs. DBND - Expense Ratio Comparison

DCMT has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than DBND's 0.50% expense ratio.

DCMT

DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF

DBND

DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF

Return for Risk

DCMT vs. DBND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DCMT

DCMT Risk / Return Rank: 81
DCMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
DCMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
DCMT Omega Ratio Rank: 76
DCMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
DCMT Martin Ratio Rank: 76

DBND

DBND Risk / Return Rank: 57
DBND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
DBND Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
DBND Omega Ratio Rank: 54
DBND Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
DBND Martin Ratio Rank: 50

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DCMT vs. DBND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF (DCMT) and DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF (DBND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DCMT	DBND	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.62	1.09	+0.53
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.21	1.54	+0.67
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.20	+0.10
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.70	1.52	+1.18
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.42	4.82	+3.60
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DCMT vs. DBND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DCMT Sharpe Ratio is 1.62, which is higher than the DBND Sharpe Ratio of 1.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DCMT and DBND, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DCMT	DBND	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.62	1.09	+0.53
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.20	0.48	+0.72

Correlation

The correlation between DCMT and DBND is -0.18. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.

Dividends

DCMT vs. DBND - Dividend Comparison

DCMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.88%, less than DBND's 4.77% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
DCMT DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF	2.88%	3.67%	1.59%	0.00%	0.00%
DBND DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF	4.77%	4.78%	5.19%	4.39%	2.74%

Drawdowns

DCMT vs. DBND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DCMT drawdown since its inception was -11.95%, which is greater than DBND's maximum drawdown of -9.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DCMT and DBND.

Drawdown Indicators

	DCMT	DBND	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.95%	-9.39%	-2.56%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.05%	-2.78%	-8.27%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.56%	-2.07%	+0.51%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.20%	-2.29%	-0.91%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.54%	0.88%	+2.66%

Volatility

DCMT vs. DBND - Volatility Comparison

DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF (DCMT) has a higher volatility of 8.79% compared to DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF (DBND) at 1.46%. This indicates that DCMT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DCMT	DBND	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.79%	1.46%	+7.33%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.24%	2.18%	+11.06%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.57%	3.71%	+13.86%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.83%	5.15%	+9.68%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.83%	5.15%	+9.68%