PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DCLVX vs. FBLEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DCLVX vs. FBLEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dunham Large Cap Value Fund (DCLVX) and Fidelity Series Stock Selector Large Cap Value Fund (FBLEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with DCLVX having a 14.08% return and FBLEX slightly higher at 14.47%. Over the past 10 years, DCLVX has underperformed FBLEX with an annualized return of 9.73%, while FBLEX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.31% annualized return.


DCLVX

1D
0.80%
1M
2.17%
6M
9.39%
YTD
14.08%
1Y
26.26%
3Y*
13.97%
5Y*
9.18%
10Y*
9.73%
ALL TIME*
6.63%

FBLEX

1D
0.44%
1M
2.42%
6M
10.88%
YTD
14.47%
1Y
27.48%
3Y*
18.37%
5Y*
12.98%
10Y*
12.31%
ALL TIME*
12.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

DCLVX vs. FBLEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DCLVX
Dunham Large Cap Value Fund
14.08%16.84%9.49%8.41%-9.05%27.52%1.41%24.85%-9.78%14.06%
FBLEX
Fidelity Series Stock Selector Large Cap Value Fund
14.47%17.06%18.04%15.60%-4.82%26.83%4.34%25.57%-9.04%12.38%

Correlation

The correlation between DCLVX and FBLEX is 0.93, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2012

0.97

The correlation between DCLVX and FBLEX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DCLVX vs. FBLEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DCLVX
DCLVX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
DCLVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DCLVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
DCLVX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
DCLVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
DCLVX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

FBLEX
FBLEX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
FBLEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBLEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBLEX Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
FBLEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBLEX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DCLVX vs. FBLEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dunham Large Cap Value Fund (DCLVX) and Fidelity Series Stock Selector Large Cap Value Fund (FBLEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DCLVXFBLEXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.41

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.22

3.62

-0.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.16

15.00

-0.83

DCLVX vs. FBLEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DCLVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.19, which is comparable to the FBLEX Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DCLVX and FBLEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DCLVX vs. FBLEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DCLVX drawdown since its inception was -58.91%, which is greater than FBLEX's maximum drawdown of -39.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DCLVX and FBLEX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DCLVXFBLEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.91%

-39.73%

-19.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.44%

-6.89%

-0.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.02%

-14.71%

-5.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.16%

-19.00%

-1.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.96%

-39.73%

+2.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.40%

-0.74%

+0.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.53%

-3.79%

-5.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.70%

1.67%

+0.03%

Volatility

DCLVX vs. FBLEX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Dunham Large Cap Value Fund (DCLVX) is 2.59%, while Fidelity Series Stock Selector Large Cap Value Fund (FBLEX) has a volatility of 3.10%. This indicates that DCLVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBLEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DCLVXFBLEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.59%

3.10%

-0.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.27%

8.23%

+0.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.95%

10.91%

+0.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.76%

14.74%

+0.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.03%

17.34%

-0.31%

DCLVX vs. FBLEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DCLVX has a 2.10% expense ratio, which is higher than FBLEX's 0.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

DCLVX vs. FBLEX - Dividend Comparison

DCLVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.20%, less than FBLEX's 9.70% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DCLVX
Dunham Large Cap Value Fund
4.20%4.80%0.00%5.01%2.30%6.51%0.31%2.88%4.61%1.15%0.95%36.28%
FBLEX
Fidelity Series Stock Selector Large Cap Value Fund
9.70%9.95%12.63%5.05%12.66%14.51%3.85%5.65%10.97%7.09%2.47%13.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, DCLVX and FBLEX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FBLEX has higher volatility (3.10%) compared to DCLVX (2.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DCLVX dropped -58.91% vs FBLEX's -39.73%.

FBLEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 2.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DCLVX and FBLEX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer