PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DCLVX vs. DCDGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DCLVX vs. DCDGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dunham Large Cap Value Fund (DCLVX) and Dunham Small Cap Growth Fund (DCDGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DCLVX achieves a 10.30% return, which is significantly lower than DCDGX's 22.88% return. Over the past 10 years, DCLVX has underperformed DCDGX with an annualized return of 9.71%, while DCDGX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.42% annualized return.


DCLVX

1D
0.41%
1M
1.16%
YTD
10.30%
6M
9.82%
1Y
24.73%
3Y*
14.00%
5Y*
9.36%
10Y*
9.71%

DCDGX

1D
2.69%
1M
5.61%
YTD
22.88%
6M
19.33%
1Y
43.57%
3Y*
17.38%
5Y*
3.85%
10Y*
13.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DCLVX vs. DCDGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DCLVX
Dunham Large Cap Value Fund
10.30%16.84%9.49%8.41%-9.05%27.52%1.41%24.85%-9.78%14.06%
DCDGX
Dunham Small Cap Growth Fund
22.88%11.14%13.01%20.48%-33.69%4.19%67.17%23.96%-4.54%28.81%

Correlation

The correlation between DCLVX and DCDGX is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2004

0.78

The correlation between DCLVX and DCDGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DCLVX vs. DCDGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DCLVX
DCLVX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
DCLVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DCLVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
DCLVX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
DCLVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
DCLVX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

DCDGX
DCDGX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
DCDGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DCDGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
DCDGX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
DCDGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
DCDGX Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DCLVX vs. DCDGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dunham Large Cap Value Fund (DCLVX) and Dunham Small Cap Growth Fund (DCDGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DCLVXDCDGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.31

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.36

3.17

+0.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.40

12.76

+1.64

DCLVX vs. DCDGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DCLVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.27, which is comparable to the DCDGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DCLVX and DCDGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DCLVX vs. DCDGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DCLVX drawdown since its inception was -58.91%, which is greater than DCDGX's maximum drawdown of -56.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DCLVX and DCDGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DCLVXDCDGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.91%

-56.02%

-2.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.44%

-13.42%

+5.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.02%

-27.95%

+7.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.16%

-48.05%

+27.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.96%

-48.05%

+11.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.55%

0.00%

-0.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.58%

-14.90%

+5.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.73%

3.33%

-1.60%

Volatility

DCLVX vs. DCDGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Dunham Large Cap Value Fund (DCLVX) is 3.61%, while Dunham Small Cap Growth Fund (DCDGX) has a volatility of 8.75%. This indicates that DCLVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DCDGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DCLVXDCDGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.61%

8.75%

-5.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.43%

17.91%

-9.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.00%

22.88%

-11.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.85%

25.86%

-11.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.09%

24.88%

-7.79%

DCLVX vs. DCDGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DCLVX has a 2.10% expense ratio, which is lower than DCDGX's 2.83% expense ratio.


Dividends

DCLVX vs. DCDGX - Dividend Comparison

DCLVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.35%, less than DCDGX's 5.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DCDGX
Dunham Small Cap Growth Fund
5.49%6.74%0.00%0.00%0.00%29.30%22.33%2.06%38.51%20.51%0.00%11.22%
DCLVX
Dunham Large Cap Value Fund
4.35%4.80%0.00%5.01%2.30%6.51%0.31%2.88%4.61%1.15%0.95%36.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


DCLVX and DCDGX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DCDGX has higher volatility (8.75%) compared to DCLVX (3.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DCLVX dropped -58.91% vs DCDGX's -56.02%.

DCLVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DCLVX and DCDGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer