DCLVX vs. DCDGX
DCLVX (Dunham Large Cap Value Fund) and DCDGX (Dunham Small Cap Growth Fund) are both mutual funds - DCLVX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund managed by Dunham, while DCDGX is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Dunham. Over the past 10 years, DCLVX returned 9.71%/yr vs 13.42%/yr for DCDGX. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DCLVX charges 2.10%/yr vs 2.83%/yr for DCDGX.
Performance
DCLVX vs. DCDGX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DCLVX achieves a 10.30% return, which is significantly lower than DCDGX's 22.88% return. Over the past 10 years, DCLVX has underperformed DCDGX with an annualized return of 9.71%, while DCDGX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.42% annualized return.
DCLVX
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- 1.16%
- YTD
- 10.30%
- 6M
- 9.82%
- 1Y
- 24.73%
- 3Y*
- 14.00%
- 5Y*
- 9.36%
- 10Y*
- 9.71%
DCDGX
- 1D
- 2.69%
- 1M
- 5.61%
- YTD
- 22.88%
- 6M
- 19.33%
- 1Y
- 43.57%
- 3Y*
- 17.38%
- 5Y*
- 3.85%
- 10Y*
- 13.42%
DCLVX vs. DCDGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DCLVX Dunham Large Cap Value Fund | 10.30% | 16.84% | 9.49% | 8.41% | -9.05% | 27.52% | 1.41% | 24.85% | -9.78% | 14.06% |
DCDGX Dunham Small Cap Growth Fund | 22.88% | 11.14% | 13.01% | 20.48% | -33.69% | 4.19% | 67.17% | 23.96% | -4.54% | 28.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between DCLVX and DCDGX is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2004 | 0.78 |
The correlation between DCLVX and DCDGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DCLVX vs. DCDGX — Risk / Return Rank
DCLVX
DCDGX
DCLVX vs. DCDGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dunham Large Cap Value Fund (DCLVX) and Dunham Small Cap Growth Fund (DCDGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DCLVX | DCDGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.31 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.36 | 3.17 | +0.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.40 | 12.76 | +1.64 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DCLVX vs. DCDGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DCLVX drawdown since its inception was -58.91%, which is greater than DCDGX's maximum drawdown of -56.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DCLVX and DCDGX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DCLVX | DCDGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.91% | -56.02% | -2.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.44% | -13.42% | +5.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.02% | -27.95% | +7.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.16% | -48.05% | +27.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.96% | -48.05% | +11.09% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.55% | 0.00% | -0.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.58% | -14.90% | +5.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.73% | 3.33% | -1.60% |
Volatility
DCLVX vs. DCDGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Dunham Large Cap Value Fund (DCLVX) is 3.61%, while Dunham Small Cap Growth Fund (DCDGX) has a volatility of 8.75%. This indicates that DCLVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DCDGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DCLVX | DCDGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.61% | 8.75% | -5.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.43% | 17.91% | -9.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.00% | 22.88% | -11.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.85% | 25.86% | -11.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.09% | 24.88% | -7.79% |
DCLVX vs. DCDGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DCLVX has a 2.10% expense ratio, which is lower than DCDGX's 2.83% expense ratio.
Dividends
DCLVX vs. DCDGX - Dividend Comparison
DCLVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.35%, less than DCDGX's 5.49% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DCDGX Dunham Small Cap Growth Fund | 5.49% | 6.74% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 29.30% | 22.33% | 2.06% | 38.51% | 20.51% | 0.00% | 11.22% |
DCLVX Dunham Large Cap Value Fund | 4.35% | 4.80% | 0.00% | 5.01% | 2.30% | 6.51% | 0.31% | 2.88% | 4.61% | 1.15% | 0.95% | 36.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DCLVX and DCDGX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DCDGX has higher volatility (8.75%) compared to DCLVX (3.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DCLVX dropped -58.91% vs DCDGX's -56.02%.
DCLVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DCLVX and DCDGX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer