PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DCINX vs. DAFRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DCINX vs. DAFRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dunham International Stock Fund (DCINX) and Dunham Floating Rate Bond Fund (DAFRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DCINX achieves a 22.83% return, which is significantly higher than DAFRX's 1.75% return. Over the past 10 years, DCINX has outperformed DAFRX with an annualized return of 12.23%, while DAFRX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.84% annualized return.


DCINX

1D
-0.17%
1M
0.21%
6M
13.44%
YTD
22.83%
1Y
43.96%
3Y*
26.39%
5Y*
13.87%
10Y*
12.23%
ALL TIME*
6.64%

DAFRX

1D
-0.60%
1M
-0.36%
6M
1.52%
YTD
1.75%
1Y
2.93%
3Y*
6.39%
5Y*
5.01%
10Y*
3.84%
ALL TIME*
3.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

DCINX vs. DAFRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DCINX
Dunham International Stock Fund
22.83%46.37%7.65%15.98%-14.67%9.70%19.86%18.14%-14.27%24.40%
DAFRX
Dunham Floating Rate Bond Fund
1.75%5.04%7.26%13.05%-2.54%3.51%-0.09%7.18%-1.06%2.71%

Correlation

The correlation between DCINX and DAFRX is 0.35, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.34

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2013

0.31

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DCINX vs. DAFRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DCINX
DCINX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
DCINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DCINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
DCINX Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
DCINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
DCINX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

DAFRX
DAFRX Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
DAFRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DAFRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
DAFRX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
DAFRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
DAFRX Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DCINX vs. DAFRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dunham International Stock Fund (DCINX) and Dunham Floating Rate Bond Fund (DAFRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DCINXDAFRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.37

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.64

1.94

+1.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.25

6.20

+7.05

DCINX vs. DAFRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DCINX Sharpe Ratio is 2.41, which is higher than the DAFRX Sharpe Ratio of 1.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DCINX and DAFRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DCINX vs. DAFRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DCINX drawdown since its inception was -61.79%, which is greater than DAFRX's maximum drawdown of -19.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DCINX and DAFRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DCINXDAFRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.79%

-19.42%

-42.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.91%

-1.45%

-10.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.74%

-3.34%

-10.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.18%

-7.08%

-24.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.28%

-19.42%

-17.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.37%

-0.72%

-2.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.77%

-0.96%

-11.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.27%

0.45%

+2.82%

Volatility

DCINX vs. DAFRX - Volatility Comparison

Dunham International Stock Fund (DCINX) has a higher volatility of 5.44% compared to Dunham Floating Rate Bond Fund (DAFRX) at 0.70%. This indicates that DCINX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DAFRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DCINXDAFRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.44%

0.70%

+4.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.99%

1.44%

+14.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.04%

1.79%

+16.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.83%

2.26%

+13.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.53%

3.39%

+13.14%

DCINX vs. DAFRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DCINX has a 2.92% expense ratio, which is higher than DAFRX's 1.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

DCINX vs. DAFRX - Dividend Comparison

DCINX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.91%, more than DAFRX's 6.80% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DAFRX
Dunham Floating Rate Bond Fund
6.80%7.26%7.87%8.91%5.76%3.13%3.27%4.36%4.30%3.31%3.01%3.13%
DCINX
Dunham International Stock Fund
8.91%10.95%13.87%3.45%3.53%15.49%1.36%1.54%6.92%3.92%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DCINX and DAFRX have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DCINX has higher volatility (5.44%) compared to DAFRX (0.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DCINX dropped -61.79% vs DAFRX's -19.42%.

DCINX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DCINX and DAFRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer