DAFRX vs. PLFRX
Compare and contrast key facts about Dunham Floating Rate Bond Fund (DAFRX) and Pacific Funds Floating Rate Income (PLFRX).
DAFRX is managed by Dunham Funds. It was launched on Oct 31, 2013. PLFRX is managed by Pacific Funds Series Trust. It was launched on Jun 29, 2011.
Performance
DAFRX vs. PLFRX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DAFRX vs. PLFRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DAFRX Dunham Floating Rate Bond Fund | -1.23% | 5.04% | 7.26% | 13.05% | -2.54% | 3.51% | -0.09% | 7.18% | -1.06% | 2.71% |
PLFRX Pacific Funds Floating Rate Income | -1.23% | 6.68% | 8.38% | 13.94% | -2.01% | 4.36% | 1.26% | 8.30% | 0.39% | 4.33% |
Returns By Period
As of year-to-date, both investments have demonstrated similar returns, with DAFRX at -1.23% and PLFRX at -1.23%. Over the past 10 years, DAFRX has underperformed PLFRX with an annualized return of 3.81%, while PLFRX has yielded a comparatively higher 5.05% annualized return.
DAFRX
- 1D
- -0.60%
- 1M
- -0.48%
- YTD
- -1.23%
- 6M
- -0.85%
- 1Y
- 3.55%
- 3Y*
- 6.98%
- 5Y*
- 4.62%
- 10Y*
- 3.81%
PLFRX
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 0.22%
- YTD
- -1.23%
- 6M
- 0.53%
- 1Y
- 4.98%
- 3Y*
- 7.91%
- 5Y*
- 5.58%
- 10Y*
- 5.05%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DAFRX vs. PLFRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DAFRX has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than PLFRX's 0.68% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
DAFRX vs. PLFRX — Risk / Return Rank
DAFRX
PLFRX
DAFRX vs. PLFRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dunham Floating Rate Bond Fund (DAFRX) and Pacific Funds Floating Rate Income (PLFRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DAFRX | PLFRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.45 | 1.84 | -0.39 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.96 | 3.18 | -1.21 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.56 | -0.20 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.45 | 3.03 | -1.58 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.85 | 9.76 | -3.92 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DAFRX | PLFRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.45 | 1.84 | -0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 2.07 | 2.05 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.13 | 1.35 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.03 | 1.43 | -0.40 |
Correlation
The correlation between DAFRX and PLFRX is 0.53, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
DAFRX vs. PLFRX - Dividend Comparison
DAFRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.94%, more than PLFRX's 6.58% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DAFRX Dunham Floating Rate Bond Fund | 6.94% | 7.26% | 7.87% | 8.91% | 5.76% | 3.13% | 3.27% | 4.36% | 4.30% | 3.31% | 3.01% | 3.13% |
PLFRX Pacific Funds Floating Rate Income | 6.58% | 7.18% | 8.47% | 8.92% | 4.39% | 3.65% | 3.68% | 5.10% | 5.03% | 4.46% | 4.21% | 4.52% |
Drawdowns
DAFRX vs. PLFRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DAFRX drawdown since its inception was -19.42%, roughly equal to the maximum PLFRX drawdown of -18.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DAFRX and PLFRX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DAFRX | PLFRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.42% | -18.75% | -0.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.23% | -1.73% | -0.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -7.08% | -6.44% | -0.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -19.42% | -18.75% | -0.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.81% | -1.44% | -0.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.98% | -0.73% | -0.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.58% | 0.56% | +0.02% |
Volatility
DAFRX vs. PLFRX - Volatility Comparison
Dunham Floating Rate Bond Fund (DAFRX) has a higher volatility of 0.95% compared to Pacific Funds Floating Rate Income (PLFRX) at 0.74%. This indicates that DAFRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PLFRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DAFRX | PLFRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.95% | 0.74% | +0.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.51% | 1.79% | -0.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.46% | 2.76% | -0.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.25% | 2.74% | -0.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.38% | 3.75% | -0.37% |