DAFGX vs. DCSVX
Compare and contrast key facts about Dunham Focused Large Cap Growth Fund (DAFGX) and Dunham Small Cap Value Fund (DCSVX).
DAFGX is managed by Dunham. It was launched on Dec 8, 2011. DCSVX is managed by Dunham. It was launched on Dec 10, 2004.
Performance
DAFGX vs. DCSVX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DAFGX vs. DCSVX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DAFGX Dunham Focused Large Cap Growth Fund | -19.07% | 1.72% | 11.42% | 54.81% | -38.96% | 13.01% | 49.42% | 35.17% | 9.80% | 26.10% |
DCSVX Dunham Small Cap Value Fund | 2.51% | 8.67% | -8.49% | 14.23% | -13.01% | 31.15% | -3.67% | 20.13% | -12.04% | 7.93% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DAFGX achieves a -19.07% return, which is significantly lower than DCSVX's 2.51% return. Over the past 10 years, DAFGX has outperformed DCSVX with an annualized return of 10.50%, while DCSVX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.13% annualized return.
DAFGX
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- -8.97%
- YTD
- -19.07%
- 6M
- -24.16%
- 1Y
- -6.47%
- 3Y*
- 5.30%
- 5Y*
- 0.14%
- 10Y*
- 10.50%
DCSVX
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- -7.06%
- YTD
- 2.51%
- 6M
- 5.40%
- 1Y
- 22.56%
- 3Y*
- 5.55%
- 5Y*
- 2.11%
- 10Y*
- 6.13%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DAFGX vs. DCSVX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DAFGX has a 1.37% expense ratio, which is lower than DCSVX's 2.05% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
DAFGX vs. DCSVX — Risk / Return Rank
DAFGX
DCSVX
DAFGX vs. DCSVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dunham Focused Large Cap Growth Fund (DAFGX) and Dunham Small Cap Value Fund (DCSVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DAFGX | DCSVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.28 | 1.04 | -1.31 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.23 | 1.54 | -1.77 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.21 | -0.24 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.34 | 1.41 | -1.75 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.95 | 5.22 | -6.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DAFGX | DCSVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.28 | 1.04 | -1.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.01 | 0.10 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 | 0.26 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.19 | +0.27 |
Correlation
The correlation between DAFGX and DCSVX is 0.60, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
DAFGX vs. DCSVX - Dividend Comparison
DAFGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.40%, more than DCSVX's 7.29% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DAFGX Dunham Focused Large Cap Growth Fund | 20.40% | 16.51% | 0.00% | 2.40% | 0.00% | 8.61% | 2.31% | 3.33% | 8.90% | 0.95% | 0.00% | 0.58% |
DCSVX Dunham Small Cap Value Fund | 7.29% | 7.47% | 0.00% | 3.00% | 10.28% | 13.90% | 0.21% | 0.00% | 15.82% | 12.82% | 3.28% | 3.92% |
Drawdowns
DAFGX vs. DCSVX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DAFGX drawdown since its inception was -47.69%, smaller than the maximum DCSVX drawdown of -62.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DAFGX and DCSVX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DAFGX | DCSVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.69% | -62.83% | +15.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.70% | -13.82% | -13.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.69% | -37.13% | -10.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.69% | -46.71% | -0.98% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.80% | -11.53% | -20.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.41% | -11.94% | +2.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.94% | 3.72% | +6.22% |
Volatility
DAFGX vs. DCSVX - Volatility Comparison
Dunham Focused Large Cap Growth Fund (DAFGX) has a higher volatility of 6.54% compared to Dunham Small Cap Value Fund (DCSVX) at 5.58%. This indicates that DAFGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DCSVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DAFGX | DCSVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.54% | 5.58% | +0.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.55% | 12.44% | +2.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.39% | 21.31% | +3.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.15% | 21.60% | +4.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.31% | 23.35% | +1.96% |