DAFGX vs. DAMDX
DAFGX (Dunham Focused Large Cap Growth Fund) and DAMDX (Dunham Monthly Distribution Fund) are both mutual funds - DAFGX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Dunham, while DAMDX is a Event Driven fund managed by Dunham. Over the past 10 years, DAFGX returned 13.09%/yr vs 3.17%/yr for DAMDX. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DAFGX charges 1.37%/yr vs 2.38%/yr for DAMDX.
Performance
DAFGX vs. DAMDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DAFGX achieves a 4.06% return, which is significantly higher than DAMDX's 1.89% return. Over the past 10 years, DAFGX has outperformed DAMDX with an annualized return of 13.09%, while DAMDX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.17% annualized return.
DAFGX
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 5.57%
- 6M
- 3.19%
- YTD
- 4.06%
- 1Y
- 0.11%
- 3Y*
- 9.13%
- 5Y*
- 2.29%
- 10Y*
- 13.09%
DAMDX
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.15%
- 6M
- 1.70%
- YTD
- 1.89%
- 1Y
- 5.36%
- 3Y*
- 6.61%
- 5Y*
- 3.61%
- 10Y*
- 3.17%
DAFGX vs. DAMDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DAFGX Dunham Focused Large Cap Growth Fund | 4.06% | 1.72% | 11.42% | 54.81% | -38.96% | 13.01% | 49.42% | 35.17% | 9.80% | 26.10% |
DAMDX Dunham Monthly Distribution Fund | 1.89% | 7.93% | 5.29% | 4.06% | 0.57% | 0.12% | 0.44% | 5.54% | -1.01% | 4.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between DAFGX and DAMDX is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2011 | 0.49 |
Over the past year, the correlation between DAFGX and DAMDX has dropped to 0.24 - well below their long-term average of 0.49, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DAFGX vs. DAMDX — Risk / Return Rank
DAFGX
DAMDX
DAFGX vs. DAMDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dunham Focused Large Cap Growth Fund (DAFGX) and Dunham Monthly Distribution Fund (DAMDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DAFGX | DAMDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.80 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.67 | -0.66 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.03 | 5.10 | -5.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.07 | 22.55 | -22.62 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DAFGX vs. DAMDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DAFGX drawdown since its inception was -47.69%, smaller than the maximum DAMDX drawdown of -69.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DAFGX and DAMDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DAFGX | DAMDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.69% | -69.68% | +21.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.70% | -1.03% | -26.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.81% | -1.89% | -32.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.69% | -6.96% | -40.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.69% | -8.44% | -39.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.31% | -35.07% | +22.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.59% | -48.70% | +39.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.36% | 0.23% | +12.13% |
Volatility
DAFGX vs. DAMDX - Volatility Comparison
Dunham Focused Large Cap Growth Fund (DAFGX) has a higher volatility of 7.48% compared to Dunham Monthly Distribution Fund (DAMDX) at 0.77%. This indicates that DAFGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DAMDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DAFGX | DAMDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.48% | 0.77% | +6.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.60% | 1.53% | +15.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.38% | 1.89% | +18.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.39% | 4.32% | +22.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.46% | 3.95% | +21.51% |
DAFGX vs. DAMDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DAFGX has a 1.37% expense ratio, which is lower than DAMDX's 2.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
DAFGX vs. DAMDX - Dividend Comparison
DAFGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.87%, more than DAMDX's 7.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DAFGX Dunham Focused Large Cap Growth Fund | 15.87% | 16.51% | 0.00% | 2.40% | 0.00% | 8.61% | 2.31% | 3.33% | 8.90% | 0.95% | 0.00% | 0.58% |
DAMDX Dunham Monthly Distribution Fund | 7.58% | 7.83% | 8.84% | 8.77% | 5.35% | 3.47% | 3.64% | 6.31% | 4.86% | 4.27% | 3.54% | 4.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DAFGX and DAMDX have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DAFGX has higher volatility (7.48%) compared to DAMDX (0.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DAFGX dropped -47.69% vs DAMDX's -69.68%.
DAMDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.76 vs -0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DAFGX and DAMDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer